[ Usenet FAQs | Web FAQs | Documents | RFC Index ]
Part1 - Part2 - Part3 - Part4 - Part5 - Single Page
Top Document: ZyXEL modem FAQ List v4.2, Nov 20 1995, Part 4 of 5 [Info / IDSN]
Previous Document: I.8 How good is V.34?
Next Document: I.10 What will happen to the old models?
-
Search the FAQ Archives
Part1 - Part2 - Part3 - Part4 - Part5 - Single Page
Top Document: ZyXEL modem FAQ List v4.2, Nov 20 1995, Part 4 of 5 [Info / IDSN]
Previous Document: I.8 How good is V.34?
Next Document: I.10 What will happen to the old models?
I.9 What is the difference between a good V.34 modem and one made by Joe?
-------------------------------------------------------------------------------- V.34 has a collection of implementation options which will affect the eventual performance of the modem. Some options to look for in a product are asymmetrical transmission, auxiliary channel, lower speed baud rates, nonlinear encoding, precoding, trellis states, etc. Good quality modems will have implemented more of the V.34 options. [Hopefully they would have also done a *GOOD* job in the implementation.] Data Communicatons magazine, Nov 1994, pg 99-108 is a good reference to these options and their impact on interoperativity and performance. Two good V.34 modems are more likely outperform two Joe Average modems. The enhanced performance will be noticeable on lousy lines, and may be noticeable on good lines. This also means that a good V.34 modem connecting with the "Joe" modem will not notice any performance benefits.
Top Document: ZyXEL modem FAQ List v4.2, Nov 20 1995, Part 4 of 5 [Info / IDSN]
Previous Document: I.8 How good is V.34?
Next Document: I.10 What will happen to the old models?
Part1 - Part2 - Part3 - Part4 - Part5 - Single Page
[ Usenet FAQs | Web FAQs | Documents | RFC Index ]
Send corrections/additions to the FAQ Maintainer:
rwong@direct.ca (Robert Wong Jr.)
Last Update October 22 2009 @ 05:27 AM