Search the FAQ Archives

3 - A - B - C - D - E - F - G - H - I - J - K - L - M
N - O - P - Q - R - S - T - U - V - W - X - Y - Z
faqs.org - Internet FAQ Archives

ZyXEL modem FAQ List v4.2, Nov 20 1995, Part 3 of 5 [Technical FAQs]
Section - T.15 How does one patch GNU NetFax to work properly?

( Part1 - Part2 - Part3 - Part4 - Part5 - Single Page )
[ Usenet FAQs | Web FAQs | Documents | RFC Index | Neighborhoods ]


Top Document: ZyXEL modem FAQ List v4.2, Nov 20 1995, Part 3 of 5 [Technical FAQs]
Previous Document: T.14 Will V.34 fallback speeds be implemented?
Next Document: T.16 Why doesn't faxing from WordPerfect work properly?
See reader questions & answers on this topic! - Help others by sharing your knowledge
--------------------------------------------------------------------------------

Receiving:

Receiving works flawlessly, PROVIDED that you convince Netfax to send
0x12 instead of 0x11 to the Zyxel when starting to receive a new page.

Apparently the standard changed this over two years ago, and most other 
modems still also accept 0x11 as a compatibility kludge.

Sending:

The key to sending multiple pages is to throw out AT+FDT=a,b,c,d and
replace it with AT+FDT, and to set the desired parameters in a
AT+FDCC=a,b,c,d,e,f,g,h message sent when starting up.

A pre-made set of patches is available from ftp://ftp.cs.psu.edu/pub/fenner/
as a file called netfax.patches


User Contributions:

Comment about this article, ask questions, or add new information about this topic:

CAPTCHA




Top Document: ZyXEL modem FAQ List v4.2, Nov 20 1995, Part 3 of 5 [Technical FAQs]
Previous Document: T.14 Will V.34 fallback speeds be implemented?
Next Document: T.16 Why doesn't faxing from WordPerfect work properly?

Part1 - Part2 - Part3 - Part4 - Part5 - Single Page

[ Usenet FAQs | Web FAQs | Documents | RFC Index ]

Send corrections/additions to the FAQ Maintainer:
rwong@direct.ca (Robert Wong Jr.)





Last Update March 27 2014 @ 02:11 PM