[ Usenet FAQs | Web FAQs | Documents | RFC Index ]
Part1 - Part2 - Part3 - Part4 - Part5 - Single Page
Top Document: ZyXEL modem FAQ List v4.2, Nov 20 1995, Part 3 of 5 [Technical FAQs]
Previous Document: T.14 Will V.34 fallback speeds be implemented?
Next Document: T.16 Why doesn't faxing from WordPerfect work properly?
-
Search the FAQ Archives
Part1 - Part2 - Part3 - Part4 - Part5 - Single Page
Top Document: ZyXEL modem FAQ List v4.2, Nov 20 1995, Part 3 of 5 [Technical FAQs]
Previous Document: T.14 Will V.34 fallback speeds be implemented?
Next Document: T.16 Why doesn't faxing from WordPerfect work properly?
T.15 How does one patch GNU NetFax to work properly?
-------------------------------------------------------------------------------- Receiving: Receiving works flawlessly, PROVIDED that you convince Netfax to send 0x12 instead of 0x11 to the Zyxel when starting to receive a new page. Apparently the standard changed this over two years ago, and most other modems still also accept 0x11 as a compatibility kludge. Sending: The key to sending multiple pages is to throw out AT+FDT=a,b,c,d and replace it with AT+FDT, and to set the desired parameters in a AT+FDCC=a,b,c,d,e,f,g,h message sent when starting up. A pre-made set of patches is available from ftp.cs.psu.edu:/pub/fenner/ZyXEL as a file called netfax.patches
Top Document: ZyXEL modem FAQ List v4.2, Nov 20 1995, Part 3 of 5 [Technical FAQs]
Previous Document: T.14 Will V.34 fallback speeds be implemented?
Next Document: T.16 Why doesn't faxing from WordPerfect work properly?
Part1 - Part2 - Part3 - Part4 - Part5 - Single Page
[ Usenet FAQs | Web FAQs | Documents | RFC Index ]
Send corrections/additions to the FAQ Maintainer:
rwong@direct.ca (Robert Wong Jr.)
Last Update October 22 2009 @ 05:27 AM