On 29 Dec 2001, Charles Lindsey <chl@clw.cs.man.ac.uk> wrote:
> > This should be brought up in the usefor working group. Maybe we can get a
> > paragraph in there that excludes the *.answers groups from this type of
> > behavior. This way it _could_ become a standard NOT to do it to
> > *.answers. Just a quick thought...
>
> Actually, I think what is needed for the *.answers group is an
> informational RFC setting out the rules applied by its moderators, and
> other principles of its working.
This is actually an excellent idea. Also, I have some free time coming up
which I could conceivably devote to the preparation of such an RFC.
What should such a document contain? I would assume a summary of the
"Introduction to *.answers" document plus additional sections dealing with
issues not contained, one example being the ideal behaviour of news servers
with respect to the *.answers newsgroups. Any others?
Cheers,
Nick
-- Whistler: So what are we, helpless? Puppets? Nah. The big moments are gonna come, you can't help that. It's what you do afterwards that counts. That's when you find out who you are. -- Joss Whedon, "Buffy the Vampire Slayer", 'Becoming, Part Two'************************************************************* To unsubscribe send a message to majordomo@faqs.org as
unsubscribe faq-maintainers fill-in-your-email-address-here *************************************************************
[
FAQ Archive |
Search FAQ Mail Archive |
Authors |
Usenet References
]
[
1993 |
1994 |
1995 |
1996 |
1997 |
1998 |
1999 |
2000
]
© Copyright The Internet FAQ Consortium, 1997-2000
All rights reserved