>This is also specifically addressed in the *.answers post-approval
>guidelines.
This was the portion that I wasn't clear on.
> | archived copies. (Exception: If all you're changing is the date or
> | version number, and it was obvious from your original submission that
> | those might change, we've already marked it as a wildcard in our
> | records, so there's no need to resubmit it or wait for reapproval.)
Though it probably *should* be obvious to me, I wasn't sure whether the
version number change was obvious from my original submission. Thus, the
query.
>Neither guideline specifies how a maintainer can determine how their
>Subject line has been processed, i.e., if the moderator who approved
>the posting and entered it into the records properly wildcard for date
>and version numbers. However, you can get some idea by looking at the
>LoPIP [List of Periodic Informational Postings] entry for your
>postings.
Ahh. Thanks. I'll see if I can find it.
"Defeat never comes until one admits it." -Josephus Daniels
Rose "MotherFAQer" Cooper,
Keeper of the New And Improved ER FAQ
erfaq@digiserve.com
http://www.digiserve.com/er/erdex.html
http://manetheren.cl.msu.edu/~bambam/
[
Usenet Hypertext FAQ Archive |
Search Mail Archive |
Authors |
Usenet
]
[
1993 |
1994 |
1995 |
1996 |
1997
]
© Copyright The Internet FAQ Consortium, 1997
All rights reserved