|
Top Document: Win95 FAQ Part 3 of 14: Usage Previous Document: 3.5. Some MS-DOS utilities are missing. Where can I get them? Next Document: 3.7. Top ten mistakes running Windows 3.x programs See reader questions & answers on this topic! - Help others by sharing your knowledge
* 3.6.1. ...Norton Navigator (TM) ?
If you used Norton Desktop you'll instantly miss FileAssist and those
cool toys. I suppose it's OK, but a system running Navigator requires
more RAM than Win95's Explorer does by itself. Expect additional disk
swapping after installing this.
New users should just try Explorer for a while first. There's no real
point to buying a shell extension when you don't know how to use the
default shell. After all, <soapbox>why would Microsoft spend so much
time developing this interface, only to have you buy enhancements for
it?</soapbox> Such shell extenders are really for power users only.
* 3.6.2. ...uninstallers?
A must-have, if you run many old Win 3.1 programs. Make sure you
obtain a Designed for Windows 95 version; Win 3.1 uninstallers
don't recognize the Registry, where Win95 stores most of its
configuration info.
Be very careful of installing Win95 programs with such an uninstaller
active. Designed for Win95 apps include their own uninstaller, and if
you use the utility's uninstaller instead of the program's own, the
uninstaller can remove more than it's supposed to. It could also
remove less. CleanSweep 95 (TM), for example, warns you to this
effect. Heed that warning!
The publishers of uninstallers are preying on the fear of new Win95
users that they HAVE to use a "professional uninstaller" for even
Designed for 95 apps. Get serious. If a program can't uninstall itself
it doesn't deserve the logo. Complain to them, or to Microsoft, who
awarded the logo rights to them.
* 3.6.3. ...anti-virus programs?
Again, Designed for Windows 95 is the key. Otherwise, run the
anti-virus software outside of Win95.
* 3.6.4. ...Microsoft Plus (TM) ?
Also a must-have, if you have a fast machine. System Agent makes up
most of the purchase price by itself, running maintenance programs
like ScanDisk and Defrag unattended.
The other cool stuff that comes with it are for power users only,
though its web browser will get you started on The Internet with
minimal fuss. Later on you can install Netscape Navigator or MS
Internet Explorer 2.0, or even NCSA Mosaic like me, to replace
this cheap web browser.
4.00.950B users should turn off the DriveSpace 3 and Internet Tools
from MS Plus's setup, because the 950B versions are newer (MSIE 3.0
and DriveSpace 3).
* 3.6.5. ...RAM compression programs?
Yeah right. Build Washboard Abs in three weeks. "I was a 98 pound
weakling until I installed SoftRAM 95." RAM compression only works
when there's a defined API for accessing data RAM, as there is a
defined API for accessing disks, and there is no such thing in Win95.
At least, there's no way to regulate how the program accesses any RAM
it allocates.
Save yourself the hundreds of dollars of invested time and buy more
RAM instead. These programs were great for Win 3.1, where they fixed
inadequacies in the operating system. Win95 has considerably more
horsepower by itself, but it thrives on a 16 MB system for running the
big mainstream apps. MS Works 4.0, however, will run on an 8 MB system
effortlessly. Try the techniques in Swap file & caching theory to
speed up the system and run more programs.
If you really need the power to run 100 programs at once, buy a big
computer and install Windows NT, which will run all the Win95 apps
anyway. Then you'll have no resource limitations, no swap file
limitations, in fact, no DOS limitations.
* 3.6.6. ...crash-proofing utilities?
Fear mongering fuels the sales of utilities that promise to keep your
system crash-proof. Here's my own analysys of some of their claims:
1. "Stops programs from crashing so you can save your work." OK, I
can buy this one. Only trouble is, what state is your work in
during mid-crash?
2. "Warns you in advance of HD failures." So can ScanDisk if you run
it daily (Buy MS Plus for 1/2 the price of some of these utilities
and get a lot more!)
3. "Takes the risk out of adding new programs and cards." So does the
Designed for Windows 95 logo. Speaking of which, how many of
these crash-proofing utilities bear the logo? I can count them
without any fingers. :-)
4. "Your personal 24-hour a day expert." Just read this FAQ and
others.
I can also refute a lot of these claims with two words: "Broken
Computer." If your computer is in such a state that it's constantly
crashing, your HD's failing, and you can't add new cards or software,
it's probably broken. A visit to your service centre with warranty
slip in hand will probably cost a lot less than one of these packages.
User Contributions:Comment about this article, ask questions, or add new information about this topic:Top Document: Win95 FAQ Part 3 of 14: Usage Previous Document: 3.5. Some MS-DOS utilities are missing. Where can I get them? Next Document: 3.7. Top ten mistakes running Windows 3.x programs Part1 - Part2 - Part3 - Part4 - Part5 - Part6 - Part7 - Part8 - Part9 - Part10 - Part11 - Part12 - Part13 - Part14 - Single Page [ Usenet FAQs | Web FAQs | Documents | RFC Index ] Send corrections/additions to the FAQ Maintainer: gordonf@intouch.bc.ca
Last Update March 27 2014 @ 02:12 PM
|

Safelist Submitter is a 100% automated cloud-based software helping clients advertise their businesses, You website faqs.org, products, blogs, and facilities following no effort on your part!
We pull off all your advertising feat for you!
https://rebrand.ly/peussfp
createsplashpages.com/splash.php?id=5940
Best Regards
City. Belkuchi
Districts. Sirajgonj
Countries in Bangladesh
My all proton working save normally
And rfcs link workings locks and blocking
Thank you
City. Belkuchi
Districts. Sirajgonj
Countries in Bangladesh
My all protocol working save normally
And rfcs link workings locks and blocking
Thank you
I'm shocked, this is solitary of the most engrossing videos in the fascinated by of macho that I watched.
I exhort to worry it, I indubitably could not tear myself away from watching it. Would suitor to do the lull and all again.
https://xcavy.com/videos/35213/letsdoeit-lana-rhoades-creampied-at-her-porno-academie-interview/
Who conclude help?