[ Usenet FAQs | Web FAQs | Documents | RFC Index ]
Part01 - Part02 - Part03 - Part04 - Part05 - Part06 - Part07 - Part08 - Part09 - Part10 - Part11 - Part12 - Part13 - Part14 - Single Page
Top Document: Win95 FAQ Part 11 of 14: Disk Compression
Previous Document: 11.1. Why should I bother? (Actually it's not as dumb as you might think)
Next Document: 11.3. How do I compress my whole hard drive?
-
Search the FAQ Archives
Part01 - Part02 - Part03 - Part04 - Part05 - Part06 - Part07 - Part08 - Part09 - Part10 - Part11 - Part12 - Part13 - Part14 - Single Page
Top Document: Win95 FAQ Part 11 of 14: Disk Compression
Previous Document: 11.1. Why should I bother? (Actually it's not as dumb as you might think)
Next Document: 11.3. How do I compress my whole hard drive?
11.2. I heard that using disk compression is helpful on drives > 1 GB. Is this true?
DriveSpace 3, in particular, is helpful for drives > 1 GB, if you set
compression to "none". This is because DriveSpace will use a smaller
physical cluster size.
FAT file systems have a 65 thousand cluster limit (64 K, or 65 536
clusters); this means as the drive gets bigger, the cluster size gets
bigger too. On a 1 GB hard drive, the cluster size is 32 KB! That's a
lot of disk space wasted if your file is much smaller than 32 KB!
DriveSpace (and Stacker, and what-have-you) use their own file system
and emulate FAT, and they can compress the unused space in a cluster.
DriveSpace 3, in particular, will use no more than 512 bytes per
simulated cluster, if your file is smaller than this.
You can observe this by running DEFRAG on a compressed drive in Win95;
after the initial Defrag pass, it will de-fragment a second time,
showing the relative sizes of each cluster. Tightly compressed
clusters will appear shorter.
* 11.2.1. Does disk compression on > 1 GB drives work with FAT32 as
well?
Apparently not. MS describes FAT32 in KB article Q154997 and they
clearly state that disk compression does not work on it (Hey, Stac
Electronics: That's your cue! Get on it!) This probably has something
to do with FAT32 being almost completely different from original FAT
and VFAT; the root directory being a real FAT chain instead of a
couple of sectors, for example.
Top Document: Win95 FAQ Part 11 of 14: Disk Compression
Previous Document: 11.1. Why should I bother? (Actually it's not as dumb as you might think)
Next Document: 11.3. How do I compress my whole hard drive?
Part01 - Part02 - Part03 - Part04 - Part05 - Part06 - Part07 - Part08 - Part09 - Part10 - Part11 - Part12 - Part13 - Part14 - Single Page
[ Usenet FAQs | Web FAQs | Documents | RFC Index ]
Send corrections/additions to the FAQ Maintainer:
gordonf@intouch.bc.ca
Last Update October 22 2009 @ 05:36 AM