[ Usenet FAQs | Search | Web FAQs | Documents | RFC Index ]
Part01 - Part02 - Part03 - Part04 - Part05 - Part06 - Part07 - Part08 - Part09 - Part10 - Part11 - Part12 - Part13 - Part14 - Single Page
Top Document: Win95 FAQ Part 11 of 14: Disk Compression
Previous Document: News Headers
Next Document: 11.2. I heard that using disk compression is helpful on drives > 1 GB. Is this true?
-
Search the FAQ Archives
Part01 - Part02 - Part03 - Part04 - Part05 - Part06 - Part07 - Part08 - Part09 - Part10 - Part11 - Part12 - Part13 - Part14 - Single Page
Top Document: Win95 FAQ Part 11 of 14: Disk Compression
Previous Document: News Headers
Next Document: 11.2. I heard that using disk compression is helpful on drives > 1 GB. Is this true?
11.1. Why should I bother? (Actually it's not as dumb as you might think)
With hard drives getting cheaper every day, you will believe (and I do too) that disk compression is a waste of processor time, a waste of system memory, and it makes the system unstable. But, here are some good reasons to use disk compression: On FAT file systems, it wastes far less disk space (Cluster sizes are minimum 512 bytes regardless of the partition's 'reported' cluster size) It reduces the amount of CPU time spent on the hard drive (It reads less off hardware) It makes good use of smaller hard drives Win95's disk compression take NO conventional memory (At least, when you run Win95 that is)
Top Document: Win95 FAQ Part 11 of 14: Disk Compression
Previous Document: News Headers
Next Document: 11.2. I heard that using disk compression is helpful on drives > 1 GB. Is this true?
Part01 - Part02 - Part03 - Part04 - Part05 - Part06 - Part07 - Part08 - Part09 - Part10 - Part11 - Part12 - Part13 - Part14 - Single Page
[ Usenet FAQs | Search | Web FAQs | Documents | RFC Index ]
Send corrections/additions to the FAQ Maintainer:
gordonf@intouch.bc.ca
Last Update December 05 2008 @ 00:13 AM