[ By Archive-name | By Author | By Category | By Newsgroup ]
[ Home | Latest Updates | Archive Stats | Search | Usenet References | Help ]

    Search the FAQ Archives

Part1 - Part2 - Single Page

Top Document: JPEG image compression FAQ, part 1/2
Previous Document: [18] What about arithmetic coding?
Next Document: [20] Isn't there an M-JPEG standard for motion pictures?


[19] Could an FPU speed up JPEG? How about a DSP chip?


Since JPEG is so compute-intensive, many people suggest that using an
FPU chip (a math coprocessor) should speed it up.  This is not so.
Most production-quality JPEG programs use only integer arithmetic and so
they are unaffected by the presence or absence of floating-point hardware.

It is possible to save a few math operations by doing the DCT step in
floating point.  On most PC-class machines, FP operations are enough slower
than integer operations that the overall speed is still much worse with FP.
Some high-priced workstations and supercomputers have fast enough FP
hardware to make an FP DCT method be a win.

DSP (digital signal processing) chips are ideally suited for fast repetitive
integer arithmetic, so programming a DSP to do JPEG can yield significant
speedups.  DSPs are available as add-ons for some PCs and workstations;
if you have such hardware, look for a JPEG program that can exploit it.



Top Document: JPEG image compression FAQ, part 1/2
Previous Document: [18] What about arithmetic coding?
Next Document: [20] Isn't there an M-JPEG standard for motion pictures?

Part1 - Part2 - Single Page


[ By Archive-name | By Author | By Category | By Newsgroup ]
[ Home | Latest Updates | Archive Stats | Search | Usenet References | Help ]


Send corrections/additions to the FAQ Maintainer:
jpeg-info@uunet.uu.net

Last Update July 06 2008 @ 00:12 AM

© 2008 FAQS.ORG. All rights reserved.