|
Top Document: JPEG image compression FAQ, part 1/2 Previous Document: [16] What other common compatibility problems are there? Next Document: [18] What about arithmetic coding? See reader questions & answers on this topic! - Help others by sharing your knowledge Technical details are outside the scope of this FAQ, but you can find an introduction and references for further reading in the comp.compression FAQ, which is available from http://www.faqs.org/faqs/compression-faq/ (see also "[24] Where are FAQ lists archived?"). The comp.compression FAQ is also a good starting point for information on other state-of-the-art image compression methods, such as wavelets and fractals. A quick comparison: wavelets are likely to be the basis of the next generation of lossy image-compression standards, but they are perhaps 10 years behind JPEG in the standardization pipeline. Fractals have been terribly over-hyped by their chief commercial proponent, and seem to be losing favor as people learn more about their true capabilities and limitations. User Contributions:Comment about this article, ask questions, or add new information about this topic:Top Document: JPEG image compression FAQ, part 1/2 Previous Document: [16] What other common compatibility problems are there? Next Document: [18] What about arithmetic coding? Part1 - Part2 - Single Page [ Usenet FAQs | Web FAQs | Documents | RFC Index ] Send corrections/additions to the FAQ Maintainer: jpeg-info@uunet.uu.net
Last Update March 27 2014 @ 02:11 PM
|

I am having trouble reducing DPI of my paintings because most programs like my Photosdhop Elements reduce pixels, not dots.
Why would the gallery want Dots Per Inch reduced instead of Pixels?
I tried reducing DPI on GIMP, but had trouble doing that, even though I am told that GIMP will reduce DPI.