FAQ Maintainers Mailing List
Re: [faq-maintainers] Intro 'n' Q: insincere criticism

---------

From: Tom Cikoski (splinter@panix.com)
Date: Tue Dec 11 2001 - 20:58:15 CST


On Tue, 11 Dec 2001, Matthew C Weigel wrote:

>
> Anyone else have this experience, or am I overstepping an invisible line
> by getting into flamewars in the same forum for which I maintain a FAQ?
>

For what it's worth, I have included in my FAQ the most literate and,
in fact, reasonable criticism, as a FAQ item (received by EMail). I
did not attribute the author, but I provided in that same paragraph
my own side of the story and promised to do as better as circumstances
would permit in the future (mostly the crit was for expired URL's).

Some months later, that same individual solicited me for an
"op ed" item in the topical journal he edits. Now, there are
trolls and there are wackos, but I've always felt that admitting
shortcomings and promising (and trying) to do better has a
positive effect, if the criticism is not, in fact, an ad nominem attack.

JMT.02W.

*************************************************************
  To unsubscribe send a message to majordomo@faqs.org as

  unsubscribe faq-maintainers fill-in-your-email-address-here
*************************************************************



[ FAQ Archive | Search FAQ Mail Archive | Authors | Usenet References ]
[ 1993 | 1994 | 1995 | 1996 | 1997 | 1998 | 1999 | 2000
]

---------

faq-admin@faqs.org

© Copyright The Internet FAQ Consortium, 1997-2000
All rights reserved