On 18 Aug 2001, Mees Roelofs <roelofs@f2s.com> wrote:
> The FAQ is roughly made up as follows:
> 1. Preface and contents - 35 lines
> 2. Introduction to rec.sport.rugby.union - 242 lines
> 3. Introduction to Rugby Union - 410 lines
> 4. Rugby Union on the Internet - 135 lines
>
> I think it would be most sensible to keep this structure, despite the huge
> differences in length between the four sections. However, is this view
> shared by 'those who know'?
You can split up your FAQ in whatever way makes sense to you -- there's no
requirement that the parts be of similar sizes.
The only advisable restriction is that parts should probably be smaller than
64k, since there are still some Usenet sites that don't accept articles over
that size.
> And is a seperate part with the contents in it adviseable?
Really it's up to you. Some people like it, some people don't (personally
I think it's a good idea if you're going to split your FAQ). Perhaps you
could ask your readership what they'd prefer?
Cheers,
Nick
--
World is crazier and more of it than we think,
Incorrigibly plural.
-- Louis Macneice, "Snow"
*************************************************************
To unsubscribe send a message to majordomo@faqs.org as
unsubscribe faq-maintainers fill-in-your-email-address-here
*************************************************************
[
FAQ Archive |
Search FAQ Mail Archive |
Authors |
Usenet References
]
[
1993 |
1994 |
1995 |
1996 |
1997 |
1998 |
1999 |
2000
]
© Copyright The Internet FAQ Consortium, 1997-2000
All rights reserved