Re: Age of Faqs - Determining factor

David Alex Lamb (dalamb@cs.queensu.ca)
Tue, 25 May 1999 17:10:12 -0400 (EDT)

Messages sorted by: [ date ][ thread ][ subject ][ author ]
Next message: David Alex Lamb: "ACME software"
Previous message: Nick Boalch: "Re: Age of Faqs - Determining factor"
In reply to: Larry W. Virden: "Re: Age of Faqs - Determining factor"
Next in thread: Edward Reid: "Re: Age of Faqs - Determining factor"

> Date: Tue, 25 May 1999 12:00:27 -0400 (EDT)
> From: "Larry W. Virden" <lvirden@cas.org>
>
> Doesn't it seem rather silly for maintainers to be 'forced' into making
> changes whether they need to or not, just to keep their FAQ postings?
>
> Believe it or not, not _all_ information needs to change every few minutes
> <grin>...
> --

Don't worry; we're far too busy to go around deleting unmodified FAQs, unless
we happen to get a complaint that one is "out of date" from people subscribing
to its newsgroup.

David Alex Lamb
one of the *.answers moderators

Next message: David Alex Lamb: "ACME software"
Previous message: Nick Boalch: "Re: Age of Faqs - Determining factor"
In reply to: Larry W. Virden: "Re: Age of Faqs - Determining factor"
Next in thread: Edward Reid: "Re: Age of Faqs - Determining factor"

[ Usenet Hypertext FAQ Archive | Search Mail Archive | Authors | Usenet ]
[ 1993 | 1994 | 1995 | 1996 | 1997 ]