Re: spamgard(tm) in effect; try again.

Rich Lafferty (rich@alcor.concordia.ca)
Wed, 20 Jan 1999 19:16:57 -0500

Messages sorted by: [ date ][ thread ][ subject ][ author ]
Next message: Larry W. Virden: "Re: spamgard(tm) in effect; try again."
Previous message: Rich Kulawiec: "Pay us a visit. # 8BE"
In reply to: Taki Kogoma: "Re: spamgard(tm) in effect; try again."
Next in thread: Chris Lewis: "Re: spamgard(tm) in effect; try again."

Quoting Taki Kogoma (quirk@swcp.com) from Wed, Jan 20, 1999 at 04:43:45PM -0700:
> Lovely. faq-maintainers gets spammed, and then brain-dead spam-detection
> software sends another copy to the list.
>
> Is there any reason why the list software should accept traffic from
> addresses other than those on the subscription list?

The other question question is, "Is there any reason why the Reply-To: is
set to the list?"

I'm just *very* glad that the spamcatcher's bounce didn't also get
spamcaught (?), or else we'd all have quite full mailboxes.

-Rich

-- 
Rich Lafferty ---------------------------------------------------------
IITS/Computing Services  | "How should I know if it works? That's what
Concordia University     |  beta testers are for. I only coded it" -LT
rich@alcor.concordia.ca ----------------------------------------[McQ]--

Next message: Larry W. Virden: "Re: spamgard(tm) in effect; try again."
Previous message: Rich Kulawiec: "Pay us a visit. # 8BE"
In reply to: Taki Kogoma: "Re: spamgard(tm) in effect; try again."
Next in thread: Chris Lewis: "Re: spamgard(tm) in effect; try again."

[ Usenet Hypertext FAQ Archive | Search Mail Archive | Authors | Usenet ]
[ 1993 | 1994 | 1995 | 1996 | 1997 ]