Re: spamgard(tm) in effect; try again.

Messages sorted by: [ date ] [ thread ] [ subject ] [ author ]
Next message: Rich Kulawiec: "Re: spamgard(tm) in effect; try again."
Previous message: Brad: "spamgard(tm) in effect; try again."
In reply to: Brad: "spamgard(tm) in effect; try again."
Next in thread: Rich Kulawiec: "Re: spamgard(tm) in effect; try again."
Reply: Rich Kulawiec: "Re: spamgard(tm) in effect; try again."
Reply: Rich Lafferty: "Re: spamgard(tm) in effect; try again."

Taki Kogoma (quirk@swcp.com)
Wed, 20 Jan 1999 16:43:45 -0700 (MST)

Lovely. faq-maintainers gets spammed, and then brain-dead spam-detection
software sends another copy to the list.

Is there any reason why the list software should accept traffic from
addresses other than those on the subscription list?

Plus the latest Hip-Clone attacks are making Superesedes increasingly
useless.

Gym "Ill-tempered? Me? Whatever gives you that impression?" Quirk