Re: spamgard(tm) in effect; try again.

Rich Kulawiec (rsk@gsp.org)
Wed, 20 Jan 1999 18:49:38 -0500

Messages sorted by: [ date ][ thread ][ subject ][ author ]
Next message: Rich Kulawiec: "Pay us a visit. # 8BE"
Previous message: Taki Kogoma: "Re: spamgard(tm) in effect; try again."
In reply to: Taki Kogoma: "Re: spamgard(tm) in effect; try again."
Next in thread: Larry W. Virden: "Re: spamgard(tm) in effect; try again."
Next in thread: Rich Lafferty: "Re: spamgard(tm) in effect; try again."
Reply: Larry W. Virden: "Re: spamgard(tm) in effect; try again."

On Wed, Jan 20, 1999 at 04:43:45PM -0700, Taki Kogoma wrote:
> Plus the latest Hip-Clone attacks are making Superesedes increasingly
> useless.

Yep. I'm seriously considering bailing out of Usenet after 19 years
of dealing with it. The lack of responsible enforcement by all but a
few ISPs has the door wide open for these sorts of vandals to destroy
what's left of it.

Time to let them have it and start over.

---Rsk
Rich Kulawiec
rsk@gsp.org

Next message: Rich Kulawiec: "Pay us a visit. # 8BE"
Previous message: Taki Kogoma: "Re: spamgard(tm) in effect; try again."
In reply to: Taki Kogoma: "Re: spamgard(tm) in effect; try again."
Next in thread: Larry W. Virden: "Re: spamgard(tm) in effect; try again."
Next in thread: Rich Lafferty: "Re: spamgard(tm) in effect; try again."
Reply: Larry W. Virden: "Re: spamgard(tm) in effect; try again."

[ Usenet Hypertext FAQ Archive | Search Mail Archive | Authors | Usenet ]
[ 1993 | 1994 | 1995 | 1996 | 1997 ]