RE: Q: call it authorized faqs or what?

Earl Cooley III (shiva@io.com)
Wed, 22 Dec 1999 18:11:31 -0600

Messages sorted by: [ date ][ thread ][ subject ][ author ]
Next message: Paul Bogrow: "Lust in the dust?"
Previous message: Baglady Lani: "Re: Q: call it authorized faqs or what?"
In reply to: Baglady Lani: "Re: Q: call it authorized faqs or what?"

> More to the point, you are probably interested in figuring out the
> right terminology to differentiate your FAQs as non-commercial,
> unofficial, or third-party generated.
>
I thought it sounded more like he wanted wording that mentioned
his FAQ appropriate to a resume. heh.

--
\ | Earl Cooley III  *  shiva@io.com  *  <url:http://www.io.com/~shiva/>
 \| Fandom Association of Central Texas: <url:http://www.fact.org/>
 /| The SF Conventions WebRing: <url:http://www.io.com/~lsc2/sfcons.html>
/ | The Virtual SMOF-BBS: <url:http://www.io.com/~shiva/SMOF-BBS.html>
\ | alt.fan.lynne-russell FAQ: <url:http://www.io.com/~shiva/lrFAQ.html>

Next message: Paul Bogrow: "Lust in the dust?"
Previous message: Baglady Lani: "Re: Q: call it authorized faqs or what?"
In reply to: Baglady Lani: "Re: Q: call it authorized faqs or what?"

[ Usenet Hypertext FAQ Archive | Search Mail Archive | Authors | Usenet ]
[ 1993 | 1994 | 1995 | 1996 | 1997 ]