Re: a good maximum size for FAQ postings (was Re: rftm.mit.edu OK?)

• Messages sorted by: [ date ][ thread ][ subject ][ author ]
• Next message: Olaf Meeuwissen: "Re: comp.answers approval?"
• Previous message: Anthony Argyriou: "comp.answers approval?"
• In reply to: Russell Schulz: "a good maximum size for FAQ postings (was Re: rftm.mit.edu OK?)"

> I may have to check it out -- how many of those Questions can really
> be Frequently Asked?

Well, keep in mind that some FAQs go a little further than just
answering questions. I've seen some that list resources, even though
I think a web page is more suited for that purpose. Sometimes you
put in questions for the sake of education. But yes, I do agree a
500K post is waaaay to big.

--
Thamer Al-Herbish                     PGP public key:
shadows@whitefang.com                 http://www.whitefang.com/pgpkey.txt
[ Maintainer of the Raw IP Networking FAQ http://www.whitefang.com/rin/ ]

• Next message: Olaf Meeuwissen: "Re: comp.answers approval?"
• Previous message: Anthony Argyriou: "comp.answers approval?"
• In reply to: Russell Schulz: "a good maximum size for FAQ postings (was Re: rftm.mit.edu OK?)"

[ Usenet Hypertext FAQ Archive | Search Mail Archive | Authors | Usenet ]
[ 1993 | 1994 | 1995 | 1996 | 1997 ]