[ Usenet FAQs | Web FAQs | Documents | RFC Index ]
Part01 - Part02 - Part03 - Part04 - Part05 - Part06 - Part07 - Part08 - Part09 - Part10 - Part11 - Part12 - Part13 - Part14 - Single Page
Top Document: Win95 FAQ Part 14 of 14: Misc
Previous Document: 14.7. Why do 32-bit programs seem slower than the original 16-bit ones?
Next Document: 14.9. I want to get a Pentium Pro (TM) system, but isn't it slower running Win95 than a Pentium?
-
Search the FAQ Archives
Part01 - Part02 - Part03 - Part04 - Part05 - Part06 - Part07 - Part08 - Part09 - Part10 - Part11 - Part12 - Part13 - Part14 - Single Page
Top Document: Win95 FAQ Part 14 of 14: Misc
Previous Document: 14.7. Why do 32-bit programs seem slower than the original 16-bit ones?
Next Document: 14.9. I want to get a Pentium Pro (TM) system, but isn't it slower running Win95 than a Pentium?
14.8. Why didn't Novell/WordPerfect/Corel (TM) release a 32-bit version of PerfectOffice (TM) yet?
WordPerfect corp has a history of re-writing everything from scratch. WordPerfect 6.1 hardly used any built in calls in Win 3.1; they don't use the Common Dialog for file operations (which is why Norton's LFN enabler for Win95 doesn't work in it), they don't use Win 3.1 print functions (causing screwups if you leave EMF spooling enabled sometimes), and it becomes a monster in the process, with two patches so far for working in Win95. Corel just released their own versions of the WordPerfect Office programs for Win95. I haven't had a chance to look at it beyond the readme file, but that already scared me because of a notice that "This program does not run under Windows NT." I understand that Microsoft included a lot of the Win95 sub-system with MS Office 95 for NT users, but why could not Corel do the same? Other users told me the same thing... they can't even fool it into running. Sorry, Corel. For a Canadian software house I expected better.
Top Document: Win95 FAQ Part 14 of 14: Misc
Previous Document: 14.7. Why do 32-bit programs seem slower than the original 16-bit ones?
Next Document: 14.9. I want to get a Pentium Pro (TM) system, but isn't it slower running Win95 than a Pentium?
Part01 - Part02 - Part03 - Part04 - Part05 - Part06 - Part07 - Part08 - Part09 - Part10 - Part11 - Part12 - Part13 - Part14 - Single Page
[ Usenet FAQs | Web FAQs | Documents | RFC Index ]
Send corrections/additions to the FAQ Maintainer:
gordonf@intouch.bc.ca
Last Update October 22 2009 @ 05:36 AM