[ Usenet FAQs | Web FAQs | Documents | RFC Index ]
Part01 - Part02 - Part03 - Part04 - Part05 - Part06 - Part07 - Part08 - Part09 - Part10 - Part11 - Part12 - Part13 - Part14 - Single Page
Top Document: Win95 FAQ Part 14 of 14: Misc
Previous Document: 14.3. How come (this old Win 3.1 driver) works? I thought it wasn't supposed to work!
Next Document: 14.5. Can I run Win95 on my '286 with 2 MB of RAM? (joke)
-
Search the FAQ Archives
Part01 - Part02 - Part03 - Part04 - Part05 - Part06 - Part07 - Part08 - Part09 - Part10 - Part11 - Part12 - Part13 - Part14 - Single Page
Top Document: Win95 FAQ Part 14 of 14: Misc
Previous Document: 14.3. How come (this old Win 3.1 driver) works? I thought it wasn't supposed to work!
Next Document: 14.5. Can I run Win95 on my '286 with 2 MB of RAM? (joke)
14.4. Why shouldn't I run (this old Windows 3.1 program)?
Avoid running these classes of Win 3.1 apps in Win95 for these
reasons:
* Communication (Tend to replace Win95 COMM.DRV and defeat TAPI)
* Printing Systems (Waste of memory)
* Virus checkers (Can misinterpret 32-bit components)
* Disk utilities (Particularly undeleters and such that rely on real
mode disk access)
* Back up programs (No long filename support)
Top Document: Win95 FAQ Part 14 of 14: Misc
Previous Document: 14.3. How come (this old Win 3.1 driver) works? I thought it wasn't supposed to work!
Next Document: 14.5. Can I run Win95 on my '286 with 2 MB of RAM? (joke)
Part01 - Part02 - Part03 - Part04 - Part05 - Part06 - Part07 - Part08 - Part09 - Part10 - Part11 - Part12 - Part13 - Part14 - Single Page
[ Usenet FAQs | Web FAQs | Documents | RFC Index ]
Send corrections/additions to the FAQ Maintainer:
gordonf@intouch.bc.ca
Last Update October 22 2009 @ 05:36 AM