Top Document: comp.windows.x.intrinsics Frequently Asked Questions (FAQ) Previous Document: 31. Why is XtGetValues() on XtNx, XtNy of my top level shell wrong? Next Document: 33.!How do I make my life easier when designing an application? See reader questions & answers on this topic! - Help others by sharing your knowledge ---------------------------------------------------------------------- Motif adopted the convention of prefixing all their resources with XmN instead of XtN. Why? It makes some small amount of sense to not pollute the Xt name space. Unfortunately it is not really practical because it means every widget set would have to define all the resources, including ones defined by the Intrinsics. Very messy. But heh, OSF is its own world, right? User Contributions:Top Document: comp.windows.x.intrinsics Frequently Asked Questions (FAQ) Previous Document: 31. Why is XtGetValues() on XtNx, XtNy of my top level shell wrong? Next Document: 33.!How do I make my life easier when designing an application? Single Page [ Usenet FAQs | Web FAQs | Documents | RFC Index ] Send corrections/additions to the FAQ Maintainer: ware@cis.ohio-state.edu
Last Update March 27 2014 @ 02:11 PM
|
Comment about this article, ask questions, or add new information about this topic: