On 3/5/02, Bob Heeter <heeter1@llnl.gov> of heeter1@llnl.gov wrote:
> I have voted to keep the Reply-to-Sender option for the non-digest
> mode.
>
> I suspect that there is a Silent Majority of lurkers like me who find
> this
> list most valuable as a source of expert/reference information,
> not debate/conversation/community. In that case it's not unreasonable
> to require posters to take that extra second or two to think about
> what
> they are posting (as they type in the list address) before making
> everyone
> else on the list spend time reading it. Sometimes it is worth
> sacrificing the convenience of the few for the convenience of the
> many. :)
I'm beginning to wonder if we are hearing that two lists are desirable?
One as an announcement list which poses questions or issues with the poster as the reply-to.
Then a second used for discussion as issues and questions are flushed out by participants with the reply back to the list?
Dmk
*************************************************************
To unsubscribe send a message to majordomo@faqs.org as
unsubscribe faq-maintainers fill-in-your-email-address-here
*************************************************************
[
FAQ Archive |
Search FAQ Mail Archive |
Authors |
Usenet References
]
[
1993 |
1994 |
1995 |
1996 |
1997 |
1998 |
1999 |
2000
]
© Copyright The Internet FAQ Consortium, 1997-2000
All rights reserved