There is a difference between supplying a default Reply-To: where none was
provided by the posting user, versus actively changing an expressed poster
preference to a different value. Mail clients do many different things
these days, not all of them intuitively correct or obvious, so it makes
sense to set list policies.
--On Monday, March 04, 2002 7:48 PM +0100 Ralf Döblitz
<doeblitz@selene.escape.de> wrote:
> On Mon, Mar 04, 2002 at 10:10:16AM +0000, Charles Lindsey wrote:
> [...]
>> Well I vote for Reply-To set to the list (since this is primarily a
>> discussion list).
>
> And I vote against any Reply-To munging. Just get yourself a real
> mailreader, set up your mailing list subscriptuions in it and all is
> well. If you don't want to do that, don't keep other people from using
> Reply-To for exactly the purpose it was designed for.
>
*************************************************************
To unsubscribe send a message to majordomo@faqs.org as
unsubscribe faq-maintainers fill-in-your-email-address-here
*************************************************************
[
FAQ Archive |
Search FAQ Mail Archive |
Authors |
Usenet References
]
[
1993 |
1994 |
1995 |
1996 |
1997 |
1998 |
1999 |
2000
]
© Copyright The Internet FAQ Consortium, 1997-2000
All rights reserved