FAQ Maintainers Mailing List
Re: [faq-maintainers] Full-bore URL formatting?

• Next message: Jonadab the Unsightly One: "Re: [faq-maintainers] Full-bore URL formatting?"
• Previous message: Nick Boalch: "Re: [faq-maintainers] Full-bore URL formatting?"
• In reply to: Earl Cooley: "[faq-maintainers] Full-bore URL formatting?"
• Next in thread: Jonadab the Unsightly One: "Re: [faq-maintainers] Full-bore URL formatting?"
• Messages sorted by: [ date ] [ thread ] [ subject ] [ author ]

Earl writes:
>How common is it for FAQs to use
>
><URL:http://www.sample.invalid/>
>
>instead of just
>
>http://www.sample.invalid/
>
>in their FAQs?

  My faq is maintained in HTML as the base, and lynx is used to produce
the plain text version for posting in the news.groups. So if the HTML
says

An <a href="http://www.sample.invalid/">example</a> is

that results in text with the format: An example[23] is

with a footnote 23: http://www.sample.invalid/

-- 
--henry schaffer
*************************************************************
  To unsubscribe send a message to majordomo@faqs.org as
  unsubscribe faq-maintainers fill-in-your-email-address-here
*************************************************************

• Next message: Jonadab the Unsightly One: "Re: [faq-maintainers] Full-bore URL formatting?"
• Previous message: Nick Boalch: "Re: [faq-maintainers] Full-bore URL formatting?"
• In reply to: Earl Cooley: "[faq-maintainers] Full-bore URL formatting?"
• Next in thread: Jonadab the Unsightly One: "Re: [faq-maintainers] Full-bore URL formatting?"
• Messages sorted by: [ date ] [ thread ] [ subject ] [ author ]

[ FAQ Archive | Search FAQ Mail Archive | Authors | Usenet References ]
[ 1993 | 1994 | 1995 | 1996 | 1997 | 1998 | 1999 | 2000 ]