![]()
# Kent Landfield <kent@landfield.com> writes:
#
# > This should be brought up in the usefor working group. Maybe we can get
# > a paragraph in there that excludes the *.answers groups from this type
# > of behavior. This way it _could_ become a standard NOT to do it to
# > *.answers. Just a quick thought...
#
# It's not a standards issue, it's a best practices issue. If the best
# practices portions of the USEFOR disaster were already separated into a
# BCP, there would be a great place to put this sort of thing, but it's
# really not part of the protocol to dictate local filtering rules, let
# alone exempt specific newsgroups by name.
Russ, you and I both know there is more best practices in that document
then protocol issues... ;) But I won't start that here. Yes a BCP would
be a good place for it. I was more focusing on getting it discussed on
the UseFor list.
-- Kent Landfield Phone: 1-817-545-2502 Email: kent@landfield.com http://www.landfield.com/ Search the Usenet FAQ Archive at http://www.faqs.org/faqs/ Search the RFC/FYI/STD/BCP Archive at http://www.faqs.org/rfcs/************************************************************* To unsubscribe send a message to majordomo@faqs.org as
unsubscribe faq-maintainers fill-in-your-email-address-here *************************************************************
[
FAQ Archive |
Search FAQ Mail Archive |
Authors |
Usenet References
]
[
1993 |
1994 |
1995 |
1996 |
1997 |
1998 |
1999 |
2000
]
![]()
© Copyright The Internet FAQ Consortium, 1997-2000
All rights reserved