S L Painting wrote:
> On a not-entirely-unrelated point, is there any mileage in splitting
> FAQs into "current" and "historic" categories? I'm thinking of the
> "historic RFC" as an analogy, in that the information may be of some
> use to certain people provided they are fully aware that it is no
> longer current. Just a thought...
I very much like this idea ...
A while back, I was in a position to develop (internal only) training
materials at work. A lot of my starting information came from manuals
that were considered (twice) outdated. I find that often things do not
change in theory, they only change in detail.
SiKing.
*************************************************************
To unsubscribe send a message to majordomo@faqs.org as
unsubscribe faq-maintainers fill-in-your-email-address-here
*************************************************************
[
FAQ Archive |
Search FAQ Mail Archive |
Authors |
Usenet References
]
[
1993 |
1994 |
1995 |
1996 |
1997 |
1998 |
1999 |
2000
]
© Copyright The Internet FAQ Consortium, 1997-2000
All rights reserved