FAQ Maintainers Mailing List
Re: [faq-maintainers] Moderation - What's it about then?

• Next message: Ping Huang: "[faq-maintainers] Re: The Future of FAQ Posting"
• Previous message: Nick Boalch: "Re: [faq-maintainers] Moderation - What's it about then?"
• In reply to: Baglady Lani: "Re: [faq-maintainers] Moderation - What's it about then?"
• Next in thread: Russ Allbery: "Re: [faq-maintainers] Moderation - What's it about then?"
• Messages sorted by: [ date ] [ thread ] [ subject ] [ author ]

In message <Pine.BSI.4.10.10011112002110.20802-100000@malasada.lava.net>
          Baglady Lani <lani@lava.net> wrote:
        [snip]
> The problem is not a lack of moderators.
> The problem is the lack of TRAINED moderators.

Exactly. Once the five of us are trained properly the whole situation will
resolve itself fairly quickly, at least once we've cleared the current
backlog [1]. Then the process should start working again.

[1] <shudder>

Cheers,
Nick

-- 
God is dead.
But fifty thousand social workers have risen to take his place.
 -- Dr J.D. McCloughley, in "The Bulletin", 1974
*************************************************************
  To unsubscribe send a message to majordomo@faqs.org as
  unsubscribe faq-maintainers fill-in-your-email-address-here
*************************************************************

• Next message: Ping Huang: "[faq-maintainers] Re: The Future of FAQ Posting"
• Previous message: Nick Boalch: "Re: [faq-maintainers] Moderation - What's it about then?"
• In reply to: Baglady Lani: "Re: [faq-maintainers] Moderation - What's it about then?"
• Next in thread: Russ Allbery: "Re: [faq-maintainers] Moderation - What's it about then?"
• Messages sorted by: [ date ] [ thread ] [ subject ] [ author ]

[ FAQ Archive | Search FAQ Mail Archive | Authors | Usenet References ]
[ 1993 | 1994 | 1995 | 1996 | 1997 | 1998 | 1999 | 2000 ]