# At 12:00 AM -0400 08/22/00, D. Kirkpatrick wrote:
# >Maybe what needs to happen is some type of encrypted and passworded
# >web interface that any appointed person(s) could use.
#
# In any case, no matter how much you automate the process, someone has
# to maintain the automation.
I would have no problem putting up an interface on faqs.org that allowed
author/maintainers to submit, update, and manage their faqs posting.
Yes it would need to be passworded, etc. so that it would be private.
I have had a good deal of email in the past from people trying to
understand the process so they could get started.
I'd hate to see news.answers die because of bad timing for moderators.
If there is something I can do here to automate/reengineer the process
of managing *.answers postings then I'll gladly do it. I would need
a bit of help from the existing moderators to fully understand the
process they use (even though I have a pretty good idea). I'd also be
hoping that a developer or two on the list would like the access needed
to assist. ;)
-- Kent Landfield Phone: 1-817-545-2502 Email: kent@landfield.com http://www.landfield.com/ Search the Usenet FAQ Archive at http://www.faqs.org/faqs/ Search the RFC/FYI/STD/BCP Archive at http://www.faqs.org/rfcs/************************************************************* To unsubscribe send a message to majordomo@faqs.org as
unsubscribe faq-maintainers fill-in-your-email-address-here *************************************************************
[
FAQ Archive |
Search FAQ Mail Archive |
Authors |
Usenet References
]
[
1993 |
1994 |
1995 |
1996 |
1997 |
1998 |
1999 |
2000
]
© Copyright The Internet FAQ Consortium, 1997-2000
All rights reserved