> I think that this may be a question of what mental reference point one
> uses. Since I think of the Web version as being more useful, I like the
> link (the blue underlined stuff) to be meaningful in terms of the topic.
> So I don't like to use the literal URL as the link. But then when it is
> translated to text one does need the URL printed.
I'd prefer not to interpret the URL's and leave that to the reader. I
suppose if it were really an issue, however, then the HTML version
could label the URL's both with the URL itself and the maintainer's
annotation.
> This would be very helpful. Instead I don't use tables in my faq.
I'm trying at the moment to work something out in Perl that will
format the tables. Wouldn't hold my breath, though. :)
-- Robert Kiesling Linux FAQ Maintainer rkiesling@mainmatter.com
[
FAQ Archive |
Search FAQ Mail Archive |
Authors |
Usenet References
]
[
1993 |
1994 |
1995 |
1996 |
1997 |
1998 |
1999 |
2000
]
© Copyright The Internet FAQ Consortium, 1997-2000
All rights reserved