Re: followup to Edward Reid's message

Peter H.M. Brooks (peter@psyche.demon.co.uk)
Fri, 29 Oct 1999 22:58:29 GMT

Messages sorted by: [ date ][ thread ][ subject ][ author ]
Next message: David Alex Lamb: "Re: followup to Edward Reid's message"
Previous message: Chris Lewis: "Re: followup to Edward Reid's message"
Maybe in reply to: David Alex Lamb: "followup to Edward Reid's message"

> } made it past our filters. I wouldn't want to post the spam filter too
> } publicly because I don't want to give the spammers any more information about
> } how to bypass us, but a perl hacker who knows a lot about spam filtering
> } already might be able to at least suggest some improvements once they see the
> } scripts.
>
> I may be able to find some time to take a look at improving it if you email
> me a copy of it. Another possibility would be to run a copy of Mailshield
> with all filters turned on. John Buckman might give you a copy free given
> the purpose (and you tell him I sent ya). See http://www.mailshield.com for
> more info. It's fairly easy to install, and may be more productive of your
> time than having to hand-craft some procmail stuff.
>
> --
> Chris Lewis, CyberSheriff (CBC says I am, so it must be true!)
> It's not just anyone who has a Starship cruiser class named after them!
> For more information on spam, see http://spam.abuse.net/spam
> Fight spam, support Rep. Chris Smith's TCPA extension: http://www.cauce.org
>
>

-- 
Peter H.M. Brooks

Next message: David Alex Lamb: "Re: followup to Edward Reid's message"
Previous message: Chris Lewis: "Re: followup to Edward Reid's message"
Maybe in reply to: David Alex Lamb: "followup to Edward Reid's message"

[ Usenet Hypertext FAQ Archive | Search Mail Archive | Authors | Usenet ]
[ 1993 | 1994 | 1995 | 1996 | 1997 ]