Re: A three-month wait for the FAQ approval?
Kent Landfield (kent@landfield.com)
Mon, 29 Nov 1999 08:36:46 -0600 (CST)
# > From: David Alex Lamb <dalamb@cs.queensu.ca>
# > Date: Fri, 29 Oct 1999 14:18:01 -0400 (EDT)
#
# > I expect to catch up slowly during November, then get behind again in
# > December.
#
# Oh well... I submitted a FAQ two months ago, and now it seems I'll have
# to wait for *at least* another month. I'm not really complaining, for I
# know how Real Life travails suddenly leave one with no time for anything
# else. Still, a three month delay does seem to be a tad excessive,
# especially for a FAQ that has been put through the FAQ-checker and for
# which the approval from the moderators of the one moderated group it's
# crossposted to has been obtained.
#
# My main concern is the fact that the FAQ with the old maintainer's name
# and address is still in the rtfm archives, meaning that people may still
# e-mail that person with questions and suggestions. This doesn't seem
# fair to that person, considering that she gave up the FAQ for lack of
# time of her own.
#
# I know that you mentioned that training someone currently requires too
# much time (again), but would it perhaps be possible to find volunteers
# willing to take over some non-critical tasks that require little or no
# training? Just a suggestion.
#
# Victor
David, is there something I could do here that might help automate the
process ? I'm not sure what that would be but if you think of things
that could help out please let me know.
--
Kent Landfield Phone: 1-817-545-2502
Email: kent@landfield.com http://www.landfield.com/
Email: kent@nfr.net http://www.nfr.net/
Search the Usenet FAQ Archive at http://www.faqs.org/faqs/
Search the RFC/FYI/STD/BCP Archive at http://www.faqs.org/rfcs/
[
Usenet Hypertext FAQ Archive |
Search Mail Archive |
Authors |
Usenet
]
[
1993 |
1994 |
1995 |
1996 |
1997
]
faq-admin@faqs.org
© Copyright The Internet FAQ Consortium, 1997
All rights reserved