Age of Faqs - Determining factor

D. Kirkpatrick (nat@tiac.net)
Tue, 25 May 99 11:55:41 -0400

Messages sorted by: [ date ][ thread ][ subject ][ author ]
Next message: Larry W. Virden: "Re: Age of Faqs - Determining factor"
Previous message: Al Gilman: "Re: Looking at were we are..."
Next in thread: Larry W. Virden: "Re: Age of Faqs - Determining factor"
Reply: Larry W. Virden: "Re: Age of Faqs - Determining factor"
Reply: Edward Reid: "Re: Age of Faqs - Determining factor"

>Yes, it does. Ideally, FAQs that haven't been posted in more than
><insert long time here> will be cleared out of the archive, and new
>postings with the same Archive-name and no copyright problems can
>replace them. Here "long time" is not very firmly established, but
>I've used a year or 18 months in the past.

How will age be determined?

I've managed to establish a fairly static FAQ andhave it on the Faq
posting server. I have a minor update to be installed shortly but
otherwise its been static and posting like clockwork from there for me.

If I need to force an update, even if its just to resent a date clock I
think I (we) will need to know.

DMK

Next message: Larry W. Virden: "Re: Age of Faqs - Determining factor"
Previous message: Al Gilman: "Re: Looking at were we are..."
Next in thread: Larry W. Virden: "Re: Age of Faqs - Determining factor"
Reply: Larry W. Virden: "Re: Age of Faqs - Determining factor"
Reply: Edward Reid: "Re: Age of Faqs - Determining factor"

[ Usenet Hypertext FAQ Archive | Search Mail Archive | Authors | Usenet ]
[ 1993 | 1994 | 1995 | 1996 | 1997 ]