Re: Looking at were we are...

• Messages sorted by: [ date ][ thread ][ subject ][ author ]
• Next message: Gerald E. Boyd: "Re: Looking at were we are..."
• Previous message: Angela Boyko: "Re: Looking at were we are..."
• In reply to: Kent Landfield: "Re: Looking at were we are..."
• Next in thread: Thamer Al-Herbish: "Re: Looking at were we are..."
• Next in thread: Edward Reid: "Re: Looking at were we are..."

<color><param>0000,0000,FF00</param>> # As time goes by, the number of abandoned FAQs will increase. That's only

> # to be expected.

>

> Is it ? Why ? Why does the process seem to foster that idea. Why aren't

> they being handed off to others to maintain ? Why doesn't the process

> allow for removal of abandoned FAQs ?

</color>I know of several groups where the FAQ mantainer has disappeared, an while the FAQ has been
taken over by someone else it isn't being posted to news.answers.

BTW. If anyone want's to see a really old news archieve(from the eighties) see,
http://communication.ucsd.edu/A-News/

Imran

<nofill>

-- 
'Everything must either be or not be,
 whether in the present or in the future' - Aristotle

URL:   http://usenet.cjb.net  (Beginners guide to creating alt.* groups)

• Next message: Gerald E. Boyd: "Re: Looking at were we are..."
• Previous message: Angela Boyko: "Re: Looking at were we are..."
• In reply to: Kent Landfield: "Re: Looking at were we are..."
• Next in thread: Thamer Al-Herbish: "Re: Looking at were we are..."
• Next in thread: Edward Reid: "Re: Looking at were we are..."

[ Usenet Hypertext FAQ Archive | Search Mail Archive | Authors | Usenet ]
[ 1993 | 1994 | 1995 | 1996 | 1997 ]