![]()
> Now I was rather expecting it to be reposted on the 9th, but today
> (Monday the 11th), I've sent status commands which come back with:
> The status of the uk/tv/babylon-min-faq posting is as follows:
>
> It was last posted on or around 1999/01/02.
> It will be posted again on or around 1999/01/09.
> The date on the email is pukka (Date: 11 Jan 1999 13:55:22 -0000) so the
> server is keeping time. Does it just not like short intervals between
> postings, or perhaps I'm supposed to slip some greenbacks in the digital
> envelope when I email to it? :-) Are there other autoposters that are
> happier with weekly postings?
Short intervals are fine; the faq-server just isn't as accurate as you
might expect. Depending on the state of the faq-server and MIT's news
servers, postings sometimes don't post until they're a day or two
overdue. Everything looks fine, but if it doesn't post in the next
day or two please let us know.
Cheers,
-- - Pam Greene one of the *.answers moderators, news-answers-request@mit.edu
[
Usenet Hypertext FAQ Archive |
Search Mail Archive |
Authors |
Usenet
]
[
1993 |
1994 |
1995 |
1996 |
1997
]
![]()
© Copyright The Internet FAQ Consortium, 1997
All rights reserved