Re: Lust in the dust?

• Messages sorted by: [ date ][ thread ][ subject ][ author ]
• Next message: Pamela Greene: "Re: Lust in the dust?"
• Previous message: Paul Bogrow: "Lust in the dust?"
• In reply to: Paul Bogrow: "Lust in the dust?"
• Next in thread: Pamela Greene: "Re: Lust in the dust?"
• Reply: Pamela Greene: "Re: Lust in the dust?"

> My FAQ (best-of-usenet-humor) has gone through two putative
> penguin-lust posting cycles since the recent Unpleasantness was
> presumably cleared up. Though responses to STATUS requests show the
> FAQ as posted, there have been no sightings. I have therefore
> reverted to the old horse-and-(less)-buggy method.

I pretty much have the same problem with all three FAQs I maintain.
It's become a bit problematic since one of the newsgroups has had
questions already answered in the FAQ.

I use the news server at gte (I have cable modem in Southern
California). I think the spam filters are kicking in, but I have no
way of knowing. Anyone higher up on the food chain willing to take a
look at the situation?

--
Thamer Al-Herbish                     PGP public key:
shadows@whitefang.com                 http://www.whitefang.com/pgpkey.txt
[ The Secure UNIX Programming FAQ     http://www.whitefang.com/sup/  ]

• Next message: Pamela Greene: "Re: Lust in the dust?"
• Previous message: Paul Bogrow: "Lust in the dust?"
• In reply to: Paul Bogrow: "Lust in the dust?"
• Next in thread: Pamela Greene: "Re: Lust in the dust?"
• Reply: Pamela Greene: "Re: Lust in the dust?"

[ Usenet Hypertext FAQ Archive | Search Mail Archive | Authors | Usenet ]
[ 1993 | 1994 | 1995 | 1996 | 1997 ]