>The only complaint I have with faqs.org, and I believe I mailed Kent
>personally but received no reply, is that it does not allow FAQ
>maintainers to upload HTML FAQs. Instead the Usenet postings are
>turned into HTML. This is fine if your HTML version doesn't have anything
>spiffy on it. Mine does already; a clickable TOC. I like FAQs with
>clickable TOCs because they are easily navigatable.
My FAQ, has an HTML version with a table of contents already, which the
Usenet version points to already.
> So what are the chances of getting faqs.org to accept a new
> auxilliary header? I currently use the URL header to point to the
> FAQ page, which has links to a text and HTML version a long with
> links to related FAQs and mirrors. So possibly another html-archive:
> header is needed that points straight to the FAQ version.
I also use a URL: header.
Paul Hilling :- Alt.Tv.Xena FAQ Maintainer
Alt.Binaries.Multimedia.Xena-Herc FAQ Maintainer
--
(E-mail)p.hilling@bigfoot.com (WWW)http://www.bigfoot.com/~p.hilling/
(IRC) Roc-A-Roo (ICQ) 3712941
[ Alt.Tv.Xena FAQ http://members.xoom.com/AtxFAQ/atx-faq.htm ]
[ Alt.Tv.Xena Central http://www.lavhouse.com/atxcentral_ontheweb/ ]
No computer components were harmed during the creation of this e-mail,
however several billion electrons were abused to ensure its safe delivery.
[
Usenet Hypertext FAQ Archive |
Search Mail Archive |
Authors |
Usenet
]
[
1993 |
1994 |
1995 |
1996 |
1997
]
© Copyright The Internet FAQ Consortium, 1997
All rights reserved