![]()
Else why not stick with just faqs.org?
What faqs.org and the faq-maintainers list has going for it is a reasonably
identifiable group of people managing the basic information; cycnicism
notwithstanding, if small changes to FAQs were needed to make something work,
I imagine a large fraction (but not all) would eventually make them.
Perhaps an 'interact with the portals' project could replace the apparently
moribund 'faq book' project. Whatever became of the hypothetical
classification scheme for FAQs associated with the book project? We had an
Information Retrieval grad student looking at it at one point.
[
Usenet Hypertext FAQ Archive |
Search Mail Archive |
Authors |
Usenet
]
[
1993 |
1994 |
1995 |
1996 |
1997
]
![]()
© Copyright The Internet FAQ Consortium, 1997
All rights reserved