Re: rftm.mit.edu OK?

Craig Cockburn (craig@scot.demon.co.uk)
Wed, 2 Dec 1998 23:56:10 +0000

Messages sorted by: [ date ][ thread ][ subject ][ author ]
Next message: Craig Cockburn: "Re: rftm.mit.edu OK?"
Previous message: Pamela Greene: "Re: rftm.mit.edu OK?"
In reply to: Pamela Greene: "Re: rftm.mit.edu OK?"
Next in thread: Pamela Greene: "Re: rftm.mit.edu OK?"
Next in thread: Craig Cockburn: "Re: rftm.mit.edu OK?"
Reply: Pamela Greene: "Re: rftm.mit.edu OK?"

In article <9812020420.AA00684@moe.optics.rochester.edu>, Pamela Greene
<pgreene@optics.rochester.edu> writes
>Craig Cockburn asked:
>
>> I posted the soc.culture.scottish FAQ to news yesterday and it's
>> appeared on soc.answers and news.answers. However, the rftm.mit.edu
>> archive hasn't been updated - usually this happens very quickly after
>> posting the article, is there a problem with the archive?
>
>Other files archived successfully Monday night, and as far as I can
>tell your file wasn't rejected because of any header problems, so
>I'd say it hasn't gotten to the MIT news system yet. Although MIT is
>well connected, article propagation can be funny sometimes. If it
>still hasn't been archived in another few days, drop us a note.
>
I've just checked and the archive is still out of date - could you
investigate please. Any explanation as to how this could occur, I
wouldn't have thought it was propagation after this length of time...

-- 
Craig Cockburn ("coburn")  http://www.scot.demon.co.uk/ 
Port na Banrighinn, Alba. (Queensferry, Scotland)  PGP key available.
Sgri\obh thugam 'sa Gha\idhlig ma 'se do thoil e.

Next message: Craig Cockburn: "Re: rftm.mit.edu OK?"
Previous message: Pamela Greene: "Re: rftm.mit.edu OK?"
In reply to: Pamela Greene: "Re: rftm.mit.edu OK?"
Next in thread: Pamela Greene: "Re: rftm.mit.edu OK?"
Next in thread: Craig Cockburn: "Re: rftm.mit.edu OK?"
Reply: Pamela Greene: "Re: rftm.mit.edu OK?"

[ Usenet Hypertext FAQ Archive | Search Mail Archive | Authors | Usenet ]
[ 1993 | 1994 | 1995 | 1996 | 1997 ]