> Excuse me? There's rather clear evidence that he has *not* been posting
> the FAQs. That's the whole problem. Am I reading this wrong, or are you
> actually stating that you'll go with email saying "I'm posting them"
> over seeing that they've not been posted?
Given the often-sporadic nature of netnews propagation, I think that's
the only reasonable thing to do. Perhaps, if he's claiming that he
has posted them, someone should write and advise him that the posts
seem not to be making it to most of the outside world.
> I'd sum it up as "Rules don't let
> us solve this problem.
If that's how you're reading this feedback, then I suggest that you're
reading a great deal into it. The "rules" you refer to are largely
set down by news-answers-request folk themselves, and no one on the
news.answers moderation team has a higher authority to report to.
What I'm hearing is that Jonathan sees the current course of action as
the most consistent one with the way news.answers was intended to be
run. Object to that if you wish, but don't invent strawmen.
> "We don't have to tell you anything about the problem.
> Despite it being a problem that affects the whole Usenet."
Good heavens. Get a hobby.
-- ____ Tim Pierce / \ / twpierce@unix.amherst.edu / Buy our iguanas! \/ (BITnet: TWPIERCE@AMHERST) /
[
Usenet Hypertext FAQ Archive |
Search Mail Archive |
Authors |
Usenet
]
[
1993 |
1994 |
1995 |
1996 |
1997
]
© Copyright The Landfield Group, 1997
All rights reserved