RFC 1149 - Standard for the transmission of IP datagrams on avian carriers
RFC1149 - Standard for the transmission of IP datagrams on avia
Network Working Group D. Waitzman
Request for Comments: 1149 BBN STC
1 April 1990
A Standard for the Transmission of IP Datagrams on Avian Carriers
Status of this Memo
This memo describes an experimental method for the encapsulation of
IP datagrams in avian carriers. This specification is primarily
useful in Metropolitan Area Networks. This is an experimental, not
recommended standard. Distribution of this memo is unlimited.
Overview and Rational
Avian carriers can provide high delay, low throughput, and low
altitude service. The connection topology is limited to a single
point-to-point path for each carrier, used with standard carriers,
but many carriers can be used without significant interference with
each other, outside of early spring. This is because of the 3D ether
space available to the carriers, in contrast to the 1D ether used by
IEEE802.3. The carriers have an intrinsic collision avoidance
system, which increases availability. Unlike some network
technologies, such as packet radio, communication is not limited to
line-of-sight distance. Connection oriented service is available in
some cities, usually based upon a central hub topology.
Frame Format
The IP datagram is printed, on a small scroll of paper, in
hexadecimal, with each octet separated by whitestuff and blackstuff.
The scroll of paper is wrapped around one leg of the avian carrier.
A band of duct tape is used to secure the datagram's edges. The
bandwidth is limited to the leg length. The MTU is variable, and
paradoxically, generally increases with increased carrier age. A
typical MTU is 256 milligrams. Some datagram padding may be needed.
Upon receipt, the duct tape is removed and the paper copy of the
datagram is optically scanned into a electronically transmittable
form.
Discussion
Multiple types of service can be provided with a prioritized pecking
order. An additional property is built-in worm detection and
eradication. Because IP only guarantees best effort delivery, loss
of a carrier can be tolerated. With time, the carriers are self-
regenerating. While broadcasting is not specified, storms can cause
data loss. There is persistent delivery retry, until the carrier
drops. Audit trails are automatically generated, and can often be
found on logs and cable trays.
Security Considerations
Security is not generally a problem in normal operation, but special
measures must be taken (such as data encryption) when avian carriers
are used in a tactical environment.
Author's Address
David Waitzman
BBN Systems and Technologies Corporation
BBN Labs Division
10 Moulton Street
Cambridge, MA 02238
Phone: (617) 873-4323
EMail: dwaitzman@BBN.COM
|
Comments about this RFC:
- RFC 1149: Does anyone know the airspeed velocity of an unladen swallow? by Thor (7/9/2007)
- RFC 1149: I don't see any reference to whether or not the Avian Carrier is African or... by MontyPython (2/8/2005)
- RFC 1149: A TTL flag is required to determine how many hops can be achieved and to take... by DaylightIT Ltd (12/20/2005)
- RFC 1149: Will giving the birds drugs, such as speed, speed up the delivery of packets? ... by brintly (2/27/2005)
- RFC 1149: Technically, this would be a wireless protocol. Other comments have mentioned... by Chris Bradshaw (1/5/2005)
- RFC 1149: Disco Stu Dont Advertise by DiscoStuDontAdvertise (7/20/2005)
- RFC 1149: Any problems (security leaks) with stool pigeons? by JanneB (7/16/2003)
- RFC 1149: ** Problems with audit trails **There seems to be a potential problem with audit... by hdante (7/21/2005)
- RFC 1149: Broadcasting without replys could be done by using ordinary pigeons instead of... by Yagyu (2/18/2005)
- RFC 1149: What if the carrier found another bird and decided to mate? by adhadi mohd (5/23/2005)
- RFC 1149: What about long distance communication ? We may have to setup relay stations.... by Sajith (11/30/2005)
- RFC 1149: RFC was tested in my city and it works,but you need to feed the carrier with... by Eran Levy (7/24/2005)
- RFC 1149: Spoofing attacks by men in black hats are tough to determine origin and method. by roland rodriguez (9/14/2006)
- RFC 1149: a 5 ounce bird, cannot carry a 4lb coconut. It's a simple question of weight... by Z' French. (11/22/2005)
- RFC 1149: I think packet loss might result from the TTL of the avian carrier being... by Badmuts (10/30/2004)
- RFC 1149: Is it possible to adapt this protocol for VoIP? For example TPIP (Talking Parrot... by Iceman (2/6/2007)
- RFC 1149: 11/11/2004 Wall Street Journel reports inital testing of 1149-Extreme. Pigeons... by pbuck (11/14/2004)
- RFC 1149: The reliability depends on geo-cultural region! In certain cultures, festivities... by Horatio (8/24/2005)
- RFC 1149: Alternatively, a small container of suitable material can be attached to the... by RockyH (9/20/2005)
- RFC 1149: Seperating octets with whitestuff and blackstuff..??...need more description of... by robryan (12/18/2003)
- RFC 1149: which system tools should we have installed to cleanup the storage space from... by stauf (12/25/2003)
- RFC 1149: Not a good choice for a layer 1 protocol, service is only available from sun up... by Neil E. Garcia (9/23/2005)
- RFC 1149: Extended testing is in order. Performance variables need to be ID'd and... by lonnieb (10/13/2004)
- RFC 1149: one huge problem is the fly season - in middle europe between march and... by renke (10/11/2004)
- RFC 1149: I've got some considerations for this:1. Wouldn't it be a good idea to use a... by Kuechi (4/25/2005)
- RFC 1149: Well done Dave, sometimes simple things work best i.e. my mansion has thick... by Mickey (10/6/2004)
- RFC 1149: What support for Multi-cast is there?Could you support multi-cast with a large... by dc0de (10/3/2004)
- RFC 1149: We're suffering very high packet loss near our local shooting range in our... by ScottB (12/7/2006)
- RFC 1149: Sounds ready for the JIR by mrstevea86 (8/11/2005)
- RFC 1149: OTHER USE FOR AVIAN CARRIERSEqual volumes of avian carrier meat cut into 6-8 mm... by James Bryant (1/29/2004)
- RFC 1149: If the pigeon is a "African Columbus" whe can rise the available bandwidth by a... by Teufel (3/15/2005)
- RFC 1149: It is with mixed feelingz that I write this comment. I believe there is much... by richie (11/29/2003)
- RFC 1149: I think this RFC should be removed. This is stupid. Get dialup or better yet... by tberthel (5/17/2005)
- RFC 1149: Cool bananas - we need more of this for the sake of sanity. by Vauve (9/14/2004)
- RFC 1149: Referring to a previous comment, a DoS attack would potentially be fatal, not... by Jim Jones (3/1/2005)
- RFC 1149: This standard can be useful for pigeon sport events. A ping datagram is sent... by Earlybird (11/5/2006)
- RFC 1149: Can Avian Flu be considered a factor of data loss? by IngDelMonte (10/31/2005)
- RFC 1149: I live on a large diary farm. We just found a white fan tailed carrier peigeon... by becca (9/8/2004)
- RFC 1149: Perhaps a section should be added on RBI (Random Ballistic Interfence) potential... by wayne.r.howe@boeing.com (11/1/2005)
- RFC 1149: I'm just worried about the possible effects of a buildup of whitestuff and... by tetrahc (3/30/2004)
- RFC 1149: Chuck Norris created the earth in two days. He spent the next 5 having rough sex... by Chuck Norris (2/21/2006)
- RFC 1149: VOIP/CP ?Many of the bandwith problems associated with VOIP can be solved by... by esalkin (1/5/2006)
- RFC 1149: TrondBK asked: "What about Denial of Service - any statistics on this yet? How... by hyphen (2/20/2006)
- RFC 1149: Major Security concern has been released around this RFC - Avian Flu Virus by Thaiza (3/27/2006)
- RFC 1149: Avain Transmission is most likely to be seriously affected by viruses. There is... by DTR - The Answer is Yes (3/15/2006)
- RFC 1149: What about Denial of Service - any statistics on this yet? How vulnerable is... by TrondBK (5/11/2004)
- RFC 1149: I believe there has been some recent work on a proposed amendment to RFC1149... by Goresh (7/13/2005)
- RFC 1149: H5N1 updates are needed for CPIP administrators to detect and handle datagrams... by MStair (3/30/2006)
- RFC 1149: What about alternate power supplies and import/export laws? by robmichel (6/29/2004)
- RFC 1149: Well, I guess in this case packet sniffing could be very ugly and unhealthy. On... by administrator (7/3/2004)
- RFC 1149: what about if one of the avian carrier is also a carrier of birdflu? by bahadur (5/29/2006)
- RFC 1149: Could throughput be doubled if datagrams are attached to BOTH avian carrier... by Corsair (6/15/2004)
- RFC 1149: Is this proposal in accordance with the recent government name change for the... by Duncan Howatt (4/14/2004)
- RFC 1149: This is just the type of technology that USB pocket drives were developed for. ... by bluyonder (1/20/2006)
- RFC 1149: What is the effect of hunting season to reliability? by IRQ16 (10/31/2003)
- RFC 1149: African or European protocol? by Marknmel (2/3/2005)
- RFC 1149: How about using pigeons for sending and recieving messages such as happy... by Samwell (6/29/2005)
- RFC 1149: Security Failures in transfer have been recorded in areas surrounding parks.... by JaffaCIT (1/26/2005)
|
Some parts © 2009 Advameg, Inc.