[ Usenet FAQs | Web FAQs | Documents | RFC Index ]
Part1 - Part2 - Part3 - Part4 - Part5 - Part6 - Part7 - Part8 - Part9 - Single Page
Top Document: INN FAQ Part 5/9: Other error messages and what they mean
Previous Document: (5.10) Why do all these "readclose" messages show up in my syslog?
Next Document: (5.12) "cant fopen/.thread No such file or directory"
-
Search the FAQ Archives
Part1 - Part2 - Part3 - Part4 - Part5 - Part6 - Part7 - Part8 - Part9 - Single Page
Top Document: INN FAQ Part 5/9: Other error messages and what they mean
Previous Document: (5.10) Why do all these "readclose" messages show up in my syslog?
Next Document: (5.12) "cant fopen
(5.11) "File exists writing symlinking article file -- throttling"
QUESTION: I'm running INN 1.4, and the server throttles itself, saying "File exists writing symlinking article file -- throttling". Why? I have no clue, other than to note that the message is being emitted while innd/art.c tries to link a crossposted group. ANSWER: Innd wrote the article to comp/foo/123 and then tried to symlink it to alt/bar/128 and found that the symlink failed with errno == EEXIST. This generally only happens when your active file does not match your file/directory use. The three most common cases of that are: Trying to use MMAP on Ultrix Trying to use MMAP on (older) Linux Some strange interaction with tind. If you are using Ultrix or Linux, turn off MMAP. You don't have a choice in this. The Ultrix mmap() function does something completely different than the Sun/BSD mmap() function. The Linux function gives you some of the functionality that Sun/BSD mmap() function has, but not enough. (The Linux people expect to have it fully up to spec eventually, yeah right.) At least one person has reported problems with ICL DRS6000 SVR4 Unix when using MMAP. Try turning off MMAP if you find problems. Some people have also seen this, when the filesystem has problems. Shutting down the system and running fsck helped in that case. It has been reported that tind writes to the active file and this confuses innd (innd assumes it is the only process writing to the active file). If you are using tin, upgrade to the newest version of tin, it can read the NOV database rather than the "tin" database. To fix the active file (which may be corrupted), make sure nobody else is writing to the active file, then do ctlinnd renumber '' to get things synchronized again. If your history file is corrupt, you should do: ctlinnd renumber '' makehistory -buv (or -bunv see #6.6 for it) ctlinnd renumber '' (Note: the "makehistory" will take hours to run. See #7.53 on this.) IF YOU IGNORE THIS PROBLEM LONG ENOUGH (by issuing the "go" command via ctlinnd) you will eventually get a "innd: ME cant update_active control" message in syslog. The cause of this error is dealt with elsewhere in this FAQ (#5.17).
Top Document: INN FAQ Part 5/9: Other error messages and what they mean
Previous Document: (5.10) Why do all these "readclose" messages show up in my syslog?
Next Document: (5.12) "cant fopen
Part1 - Part2 - Part3 - Part4 - Part5 - Part6 - Part7 - Part8 - Part9 - Single Page
[ Usenet FAQs | Web FAQs | Documents | RFC Index ]
Send corrections/additions to the FAQ Maintainer:
hwr@pilhuhn.de (Heiko W.Rupp)
Last Update October 22 2009 @ 05:35 AM