|
Top Document: news.groups.reviews guidelines Previous Document: A Sample Review Next Document: news.groups.reviews Archives See reader questions & answers on this topic! - Help others by sharing your knowledge The most important thing to remember is that the people reading the review probably haven't heard of your group or mailing list. Tell them why they would be interested. Because many of the readers will still be new to netnews (news.groups.reviews is placed near the top of newsgroup lists at America Online, among other things), it is important that the reviews contain enough information to describe the group even to a newbie. In general, I would appreciate it if reviews followed these guidelines: Reviews should be written by people who read and enjoy the group in question. If the reviewed group isn't worth reading, then ignorance is indeed bliss. (Yes, it might feel good to write a negative review, but who will it help? Mostly, it will just result in you (and me) getting a lot of hate mail. Please remember that there are enough newsgroups that people won't be trying them all. If they wander in on their own, your review isn't going to discourage them, and if they don't, why waste their time?) Reviews should be one-time things. In a year, it might be worth reviewing again, but the group shouldn't change very much in a week. For the same reason, I prefer reviews of groups that have been up a few months -- it can take that long to know what the group will really be like. (I will accept alternate reviews from different reviewers, if they are substantially different, but I would prefer to review another as-yet-unreviewed group. news.groups.reviews will not be a discussion forum, so it may be worth running your review by other readers first -- particularly if it is a second review.) Questions about "Where can I find a group about X?" should be sent to news.groups.questions. Discussion of the review normally takes place in the reviewed group itself. (Reviews are cross-posted to the reviewed newsgroups as a courtesy to newsgroup readers. They deserve to know what's being said about their newsgroup, after all.) Hate mail should be sent straight to me, as I'm very good at ignoring it, and that gives you an easy way to vent. Reviews of (publicly accessible) mailing lists are encouraged, but interested readers are also directed to the short summaries available elsewhere. If you would like one of these lists of mailing lists, Stephanie da Silva posts one to news.lists.misc. If it has expired on your site, you can read her list on the World Wide Web at <URL:http://www.NeoSoft.com/internet/paml/>. In your review, please try to express the flavor of the group as a whole. Ideally, this will involve summarizing some recent threads, so that potential readers will have an example as well as a description. Reviews need not be restricted to the big 8 -- if the group is widely available (e.g., alt.* or uk.*) that is sufficient. Reviewed mailing lists should be open to all readers without restriction. (Note that they need not be open to all posters; only to all readers.) Although the lingua franca of news.groups.reviews (like most Big 8 newsgroups) is English, I can read Spanish, and I'm willing to accept Spanish-language reviews of Spanish-language newsgroups. The use of other languages will depend on the availability of volunteers to help me. (I have a volunteer for French -- We'll see how it works out when and if I ever receive a review in French.) Reviews are generally posted with the submitter's .signature intact, but the moderator reserves the right to edit .signatures that are unusually long, wider than 80 characters, or too tab-damaged to reconstruct. PGP-signed reviews will also be accepted. Postings of these guidelines will always be PGP-signed. news.groups.reviews will publish anonymous reviews (reviewer's name and/or address witheld by request), but the reviewer must supply a valid return address on the *submission* in case I need to contact them about the review. User Contributions:Comment about this article, ask questions, or add new information about this topic:Top Document: news.groups.reviews guidelines Previous Document: A Sample Review Next Document: news.groups.reviews Archives Single Page [ Usenet FAQs | Web FAQs | Documents | RFC Index ] Send corrections/additions to the FAQ Maintainer: news-groups-reviews@moderators.uu.net
Last Update August 08 2012 @ 06:20 AM
|
