[ Usenet FAQs | Web FAQs | Documents | RFC Index ]
Single Page
Top Document: Moderated Newsgroups FAQ
Previous Document: Q3.4 How are changes made to a moderated group?
Next Document: Q3.6 Can moderation be accomplished retro-actively?
-
Search the FAQ Archives
Single Page
Top Document: Moderated Newsgroups FAQ
Previous Document: Q3.4 How are changes made to a moderated group?
Next Document: Q3.6 Can moderation be accomplished retro-actively?
Q3.5 Could changes be forced upon a moderated group?
The RFD/CFV process could be used to change the status of a group,
including:
to create a new group - moderated or unmoderated
to moderate an unmoderated group
to unmoderate a moderated group
to re-organize a set of groups
to replace a retired moderator, or one who has vanished
but note that any RFD/CFV process would require:
a minimum of 2 months
a lot of work on the part of the RFD/CFV proponent
possibly a new moderator (or panel of moderators)
a (possibly contentious) discussion on the proposal
There is no method currently available on Usenet to remove
or replace a moderator who actively opposes replacement.
The moderator of news.announce.newgroups is not likely to post
a proposal for removing a moderator as long as he or she continues
to give some sort of service to the newsgroup's readership.
The closest alternative is to use a different newsgroup,
or to propose creation of one with the RFD/CFV process,
which requires a 2:1, 100+ margin. (See the Usenet Guidelines)
Top Document: Moderated Newsgroups FAQ
Previous Document: Q3.4 How are changes made to a moderated group?
Next Document: Q3.6 Can moderation be accomplished retro-actively?
Single Page
[ Usenet FAQs | Web FAQs | Documents | RFC Index ]
Send corrections/additions to the FAQ Maintainer:
Dmckeon@swcp.com (Denis McKeon)
Last Update October 22 2009 @ 05:35 AM