[ Usenet FAQs | Search | Web FAQs | Documents | RFC Index ]
Like many things on the net, that depends. Specifically, it depends
on the connectivity of the poster's site, the moderator's site, and
each individual reader's site, and on whether everything is working
normally and well among those sites.
In general, hand-moderated newsgroups often have some unavoidable
delay, while robo-moderated groups often have fast turnaround.
If we assume that:
a message travels faster by e-mail than by news
from the poster's site to the moderation site
the moderator's site is well-connected (for mail and news)
the poster's site is less well-connected (for news)
the moderation process incurs little delay (such as if it
is a program set up to recognize messages from known posters)
then a moderated group *might* provide faster propagation
for that message than an unmoderated group.
On the other hand, if a moderation address is at a poorly connected
site, and the poster is at a well connected site, or if there is a
delay of significant length at the moderation address, then the
moderated newsgroup might have a greater lag and thus a slower pace.
On the other other hand, readers of a group might prefer a slower
paced newsgroup over a rapid-response group. In any case,
anyone who volunteers to moderate a newsgroup should plan
to work to reduce delay in the moderation process.
Send corrections/additions to the FAQ Maintainer:
Last Update May 13 2007 @ 00:24 AM