|
Top Document: comp.sys.hp.hpux FAQ Previous Document: 5.6.2 What happened to the sysdiag command? Next Document: 5.7 Networking and Communications See reader questions & answers on this topic! - Help others by sharing your knowledge
There are, of course, many answers to this question. Many people have
noticed that HP's conservative choices in some configuration areas affect
performance, especially as compared to Solaris. A couple examples:
o 'fs_async' kernel parameter
HP-UX by default makes all file systems I/O synchronous. Sun[R],
by contrast, defaults to asynchronous I/O and depends on the syncer.
Changing this parameter's value from 0 to 1 can significantly
increase write speeds, BUT at the risk of losing data in a system
crash. You can change this parameter using SAM.
o 'async' NFS option
Similar to local writes, NFS writes to a filesystem exported from an
HP-UX system are synchronous by default. Add the async option to
your /etc/exports if you want to change that, but be sure to
carefully read the exports(4) manpage first.
An abundance of performance tuning tips are provided by HP in the following
tuning guides:
o HP-UX Workstation System Tuning and Performance Guide, 08/31/00:
<http://www.hp-partners.com/tcl_public/html/technical_support/tuning.html>
o HP-UX Kernel Tuning and Performance Guide v3.1, 03/15/00:
<http://docs.hp.com/en/1219/tuningwp.html>
User Contributions:Top Document: comp.sys.hp.hpux FAQ Previous Document: 5.6.2 What happened to the sysdiag command? Next Document: 5.7 Networking and Communications Single Page [ Usenet FAQs | Web FAQs | Documents | RFC Index ] Send corrections/additions to the FAQ Maintainer: hpux.faq@gmail.com
Last Update March 27 2014 @ 02:11 PM
|

Comment about this article, ask questions, or add new information about this topic: