Top Document: comp.sys.hp.hpux FAQ Previous Document: 5.6.2 What happened to the sysdiag command? Next Document: 5.7 Networking and Communications See reader questions & answers on this topic! - Help others by sharing your knowledge There are, of course, many answers to this question. Many people have noticed that HP's conservative choices in some configuration areas affect performance, especially as compared to Solaris. A couple examples: o 'fs_async' kernel parameter HP-UX by default makes all file systems I/O synchronous. Sun[R], by contrast, defaults to asynchronous I/O and depends on the syncer. Changing this parameter's value from 0 to 1 can significantly increase write speeds, BUT at the risk of losing data in a system crash. You can change this parameter using SAM. o 'async' NFS option Similar to local writes, NFS writes to a filesystem exported from an HP-UX system are synchronous by default. Add the async option to your /etc/exports if you want to change that, but be sure to carefully read the exports(4) manpage first. An abundance of performance tuning tips are provided by HP in the following tuning guides: o HP-UX Workstation System Tuning and Performance Guide, 08/31/00: <http://www.hp-partners.com/tcl_public/html/technical_support/tuning.html> o HP-UX Kernel Tuning and Performance Guide v3.1, 03/15/00: <http://docs.hp.com/en/1219/tuningwp.html> User Contributions:Top Document: comp.sys.hp.hpux FAQ Previous Document: 5.6.2 What happened to the sysdiag command? Next Document: 5.7 Networking and Communications Single Page [ Usenet FAQs | Web FAQs | Documents | RFC Index ] Send corrections/additions to the FAQ Maintainer: hpux.faq@gmail.com
Last Update March 27 2014 @ 02:11 PM
|
Comment about this article, ask questions, or add new information about this topic: