Top Document: comp.sys.hp.hpux FAQ Previous Document: 8.17 What should go in my PATH and MANPATH environment variables? Next Document: 8.19 Can I run Linux on an HP9000 system? See reader questions & answers on this topic! - Help others by sharing your knowledge Updated: 04/05/01 The 9.x cksum was defective - it did not correctly implement the POSIX spec. That is understandable, because the POSIX cksum spec does not supply a test suite to easily verify an implementation is correct. The 10.x/11.x cksum is correct. Unfortunately that means it can not match 9.x cksum. Another implementation that did not match POSIX spec was in AIX 3.*; I haven't checked AIX 4.* or Solaris. Other good implementations (they give the same answer as 10.x/11.x cksum): - GNU cksum - Solaris 7/8 - HP Software Distributor swpackage program, on both 9.x and 10.x User Contributions:Top Document: comp.sys.hp.hpux FAQ Previous Document: 8.17 What should go in my PATH and MANPATH environment variables? Next Document: 8.19 Can I run Linux on an HP9000 system? Single Page [ Usenet FAQs | Web FAQs | Documents | RFC Index ] Send corrections/additions to the FAQ Maintainer: hpux.faq@gmail.com
Last Update March 27 2014 @ 02:11 PM
|
Comment about this article, ask questions, or add new information about this topic: