[ Usenet FAQs | Web FAQs | Documents | RFC Index ]
Single Page
Top Document: Gnus (Emacs Newsreader) FAQ
Previous Document: Q4.17 My splitting rules seem to miss a few messages. Why?
-
Search the FAQ Archives
Single Page
Top Document: Gnus (Emacs Newsreader) FAQ
Previous Document: Q4.17 My splitting rules seem to miss a few messages. Why?
Q4.18 What is the difference between total-expire and auto-expire?
auto-expire:
When an article is read (the word `read' here being a verb, not a noun
referring to the mark), Gnus also marks it as expirable (`E'). When
the expiry process occurs, it explicitly uses the articles marked with
`E' as the set of articles eligible for expiration.
total-expire:
No `E' marks are used or relevant at all. When the expiry process
occurs, articles marked as read are eligible for expiration. Note that
this means articles that are not unmarked and are not marked with
either `!' or `?' as both of those marks are just special ways of
saying "unread".
The real difference:
The benefit of auto-expire is that in really huge groups (several
thousand messages) or groups with really old ticked of dormant
messages, the expiry process will be much faster. This is due to the
fact that Gnus has an explicit list of eligible articles, instead of
having to rebuild such a list each time expiry is invoked.
The benefit of total-expire is that it is simpler. There is no such
thing as a special mark for expirable messages. All articles that are
read and not marked otherwise will be expired once they are old
enough.
------------------------------
This FAQ is Copyright © 1995, 1996 Free Software Foundation. Please
send comments, and suggestions to Justin Sheehy
<URL:mailto:dworkin@ccs.neu.edu>.
Top Document: Gnus (Emacs Newsreader) FAQ
Previous Document: Q4.17 My splitting rules seem to miss a few messages. Why?
Single Page
[ Usenet FAQs | Web FAQs | Documents | RFC Index ]
Send corrections/additions to the FAQ Maintainer:
Justin Sheehy <dworkin@ccs.neu.edu>
Last Update October 23 2009 @ 08:41 AM