[ Usenet FAQs | Search | Web FAQs | Documents | RFC Index ]
Part1 - Part2 - Single Page
Top Document: Electrical Wiring FAQ (Part 2 of 2)
Previous Document: Copper wire characteristics table
Next Document: Other links http://www.epanorama.net/wire_mains.html
-
Search the FAQ Archives
Part1 - Part2 - Single Page
Top Document: Electrical Wiring FAQ (Part 2 of 2)
Previous Document: Copper wire characteristics table
Next Document: Other links http://www.epanorama.net/wire_mains.html
Smoke detector guidelines
Many (most?) building codes now require the installation of
smoke detectors in homes. In fact, this has been made
retroactive in many municipalities.
There are many different types of smoke detectors. Ionization,
photo-cell, battery-powered, AC-powered etc. The only thing
we're concerned with here, is AC versus battery powered, other
than to comment that most building codes are based around
ionization detectors, photocell units being usually for
somewhat more specialized purposes. All things being equal, in
a residential setting with the "ordinary fire", an ionization
detector will detect smoke before a photo-cell will - indeed,
in some fires, the smoke is almost invisible, and less likely
to trip a photo-cell.
There is another type of fire detectors - "heat detectors".
These work usually by a small piece of special metal melting at
110F or so. These are much better at avoiding false trips.
But they usually take much longer to trip than a smoke detector, and
should usually only be considered for triggering sprinkler
devices (where the consequences of a false trip are quite
severe). Heat detectors should not be used as primary fire
detection.
Most building codes that mandate detectors mandated AC-powered
ones for new construction. This is because the statistics show
that, in houses equipped with smoke detectors, a lot more
people were getting killed in houses with battery-only
detectors that had dead batteries than were getting killed in
houses where the breakers tripped and killed an AC-only
detector. It's also worth noting that some battery detectors
are quite sensitive about battery condition. Some even refuse
to work if the battery is zinc-carbon (standard cheap battery)
instead of alkaline (more expensive).
Our building code discourages the installation of smoke
detectors on circuits used for other purposes. This means that
only a main-panel breaker trip can kill the detectors. A
main-panel trip is unlikely even in a fire started by an
electrical fault until well after the fire has really engulfed the
home.
These codes also usually require that the AC detectors be
interconnected so that if one triggers, they all sound the
alarm. This is usually done by an additional wire between the
units.
The above suggests that the best way of doing things is to have
one circuit dedicated for smoke detectors, and you run 14-3
between each of the detectors - the red wire being the "gang
trip" control.
If you're still concerned about losing power and thereby losing
your detectors, we suggest either the use of detectors that run
off AC power with battery backup, OR, adding battery detectors
into a system that's already adequately covered with AC detectors.
Battery-only detectors should only be considered a stopgap
measure in putting detectors into a house that doesn't have any
detectors at all, or adding redundancy into a system that already
has AC detectors.
We also suggest that, if you have battery detectors, you make
changing the battery a yearly (or semi-yearly) scheduled event.
Some people change the batteries on their birthdays. Others
change the batteries during a "daylight/standard time change"
maintenance pass.
In Canada, the day before the standard/daylight time change
(a Saturday) now seems to be officially called "smoke detector
battery day" ;-)
We don't recommend waiting for the detector to tell you that the
battery is dead, unless you manually test the detector monthly.
Top Document: Electrical Wiring FAQ (Part 2 of 2)
Previous Document: Copper wire characteristics table
Next Document: Other links http://www.epanorama.net/wire_mains.html
Part1 - Part2 - Single Page
[ Usenet FAQs | Search | Web FAQs | Documents | RFC Index ]
Send corrections/additions to the FAQ Maintainer:
clewis@ferret.ocunix.on.ca (Chris Lewis)
Last Update July 24 2008 @ 00:13 AM