Search the FAQ Archives

3 - A - B - C - D - E - F - G - H - I - J - K - L - M
N - O - P - Q - R - S - T - U - V - W - X - Y - Z
faqs.org - Internet FAQ Archives

rec.arts.bodyart: Tattoo FAQ 7/9--General care/removal
Section - FDA BAN/ALERT AGAINST TATEX USA'S DO-IT-YOURSELF KIT

( Part1 - Part2 - Part3 - Part4 - Part5 - Part6 - Part7 - Part8 - Part9 - Single Page )
[ Usenet FAQs | Web FAQs | Documents | RFC Index | Zip codes ]


Top Document: rec.arts.bodyart: Tattoo FAQ 7/9--General care/removal
Previous Document: CAN A TATTOO BE REMOVED?
Next Document: PROGRAMS FOR TATTOO REMOVAL IN JUVENILES
See reader questions & answers on this topic! - Help others by sharing your knowledge
The following, brought to my attention by Mike <silicon@cris.com>, is a
copy of an FDA alert dated September 1992  against the method of
chemical tattoo removal being marketed by Tatex,  Inc. based in
Pickering, Ontario (Canada) and marketed in the US out of Las Vegas,
Nevada. I have no reason to doubt Mike's intentions in forwarding this
alert to me. From what Mike tells me, it's possible that Tatex is a weak
acid or peroxide formula that eats away at your skin. He says he
believes the FDA alert is due to their not having completed necessary
tests. The following is the alert in its entirety. I'll let the readers
decide for themselves whether this stuff is appropriate or not.
(Reformatted for ease of readability.)

I recently received an email from the makers of Tatex, asking me to
remove this section.  I checked, and the FDA alert is still in effect, 
having been updated as recently as October, 1999, so this section
still stands.

* * * * *

FDA IA#66-11,   REVISED 9/21/92
TYPE OF ALERT: Automatic Detention
PRODUCT:       Tattoo Removers
PRODUCT CODE:  66V--99
PROBLEM:       New Drug without a New Drug Application (NDA) (DRND)
PAC FOR COLLECTION: 56008H
COUNTRY:       All
MANUFACTURER/SHIPPER: All
CHARGE:    "The article is subject to refusal of admission pursuant to
            Section 801(a)(3) in that it appears to be a new drug within
            the meaning of Section 201(p) without an approved new drug
            application [Unapproved New Drug, Section 505(a)]."
RECOMMENDING OFFICE: CDER/OTC Compliance Branch, HFD-312
REASON FOR ALERT:
          Three complaints of injury have implicated this drug as the
          source of acute inflammation, cellulitis and secondary
          infection of the skin.  All of the complaints indicated that
          the tattoo remover was received through the mail from the
          Atlanta Co., Pickering, Ontario, Canada.
          The product was received in small plastic vials labeled in
          part, "Tatex Tattoo Remover*** 2 1/2 cc accompanied by
          labeling entitled, "Instructions for use of the Tatex Tattoo
          Remover."
          Although there has been no recent detention activity of the
          Tatex brand tattoo remover, the alert remains in effect
          because of the possibility of entry which may be attempted for
          similar products from other foreign manufacturers.
INSTRUCTIONS: Detain products which claim to be tattoo removers. Notify
              CDER/OTC Labeling Branch at 301-295-8063 when detentions of
              these products are made.
KEYWORDS: Tattoo remover, New Drug, Tatex Tattoo Remover, skin, 
          infection
PREPARED BY  : Linda A. Wisniowski, DIOP, 301-443-6553


User Contributions:

1
Yusuph
I real to know much the history of tattoo, from the begin. Please send for me the all details/summary or imformation of tattoo. You can find me also on facebook as Toto mbata chico. Thank u
2
packers and movers Hyderabad
Jul 19, 2022 @ 12:00 am
Thanks for sharing amazing post.
https://nivapackersandmovers.com/
3
Aug 31, 2022 @ 7:19 pm
I can not take part now in discussion - it is very occupied. I will be free - I will necessarily write that I think.

I'm shocked, this is individual of the most engaging videos in return macho that I watched.
I exhort to watch it, I in meat of truly could not divide myself away from watching it. Would angel to do the at any rate again.
https://xcavy.com/search/anna-deville-freedom-pegging/
Who will help?
4
house shifting services in hyderabad
Oct 18, 2022 @ 6:06 am
nice post

https://nivapackersandmovers.com/house-shifting-services-in-hyderabad/
5
Mar 27, 2023 @ 3:15 pm
Whether or not you believe in God, this message is a "must-read"!

Throughout time, we can see how we have been carefully conditioned coming to this point where we are on the verge of a cashless society. Did you know that Jesus foretold of this event almost 2,000 years ago?

In Revelation 13:16-18, it states,

"He (the false prophet who deceives many by his miracles--Revelation 19:20) causes all, both small and great, rich and poor, free and slave, to receive a mark on their right hand or on their foreheads, and that no one may buy or sell except one who has the mark or the name of the beast, or the number of his name.

Here is wisdom. Let him who has understanding calculate the number of the beast, for it is the number of a man: His number is 666."

Referring to the last generation, this could only be speaking of a cashless society. Why's that? Revelation 13:17 tells us that we cannot buy or sell unless we receive the mark of the beast. If physical money was still in use, we could buy or sell with one another without receiving the mark. This would contradict scripture that states we need the mark to buy or sell!

These verses could not be referring to something purely spiritual as scripture references two physical locations (our right hand or forehead) stating the mark will be on one "OR" the other. If this mark was purely spiritual, it would indicate both places, or one--not one OR the other!

This is where it comes together. It is shocking how accurate the Bible is concerning the implantable RFID microchip. Here are notes from a man named Carl Sanders who worked with a team of engineers to help develop this RFID chip:

"Carl Sanders sat in seventeen New World Order meetings with heads-of-state officials such as Henry Kissinger and Bob Gates of the C.I.A. to discuss plans on how to bring about this one-world system. The government commissioned Carl Sanders to design a microchip for identifying and controlling the peoples of the world—a microchip that could be inserted under the skin with a hypodermic needle (a quick, convenient method that would be gradually accepted by society).

Carl Sanders, with a team of engineers behind him, with U.S. grant monies supplied by tax dollars, took on this project and designed a microchip that is powered by a lithium battery, rechargeable through the temperature changes in our skin. Without the knowledge of the Bible (Brother Sanders was not a Christian at the time), these engineers spent one-and-a-half-million dollars doing research on the best and most convenient place to have the microchip inserted.

Guess what? These researchers found that the forehead and the back of the hand (the two places the Bible says the mark will go) are not just the most convenient places, but are also the only viable places for rapid, consistent temperature changes in the skin to recharge the lithium battery. The microchip is approximately seven millimeters in length, .75 millimeters in diameter, about the size of a grain of rice. It is capable of storing pages upon pages of information about you. All your general history, work history, criminal record, health history, and financial data can be stored on this chip.

Brother Sanders believes that this microchip, which he regretfully helped design, is the “mark” spoken about in Revelation 13:16–18. The original Greek word for “mark” is “charagma,” which means a “scratch or etching.” It is also interesting to note that the number 666 is actually a word in the original Greek. The word is “chi xi stigma,” with the last part, “stigma,” also meaning “to stick or prick.” Carl believes this is referring to a hypodermic needle when they poke into the skin to inject the microchip."

Mr. Sanders asked a doctor what would happen if the lithium contained within the RFID microchip leaked into the body. The doctor replied by saying a terrible sore would appe (...)

Comment about this article, ask questions, or add new information about this topic:




Top Document: rec.arts.bodyart: Tattoo FAQ 7/9--General care/removal
Previous Document: CAN A TATTOO BE REMOVED?
Next Document: PROGRAMS FOR TATTOO REMOVAL IN JUVENILES

Part1 - Part2 - Part3 - Part4 - Part5 - Part6 - Part7 - Part8 - Part9 - Single Page

[ Usenet FAQs | Web FAQs | Documents | RFC Index ]

Send corrections/additions to the FAQ Maintainer:
stan@cosmo.pasadena.ca.us





Last Update March 27 2014 @ 02:11 PM