On Sun, 3 Mar 2002 21:18:07 -0600 (CST)
Kent Landfield <kent@landfield.com> said...
>
> # > This is the way that the faq-maintainers list is currently set up.
> #
> # i.e., broken.
>
> I'm sitting this discussion out as I have feelings both ways. I'll do what
> people decide is best but it has not been a problem in the past and I'm not
> sure it is a problem now.
Well I vote for Reply-To set to the list (since this is primarily a
discussion list).
I have been on lists where the reverse was the case, and I regularly
forgot to edit the To: header, resulting in the right people not seeing
it. And I have also been on lists that voted for Reply-To to list.
Charles H. Lindsey ---------At Home, doing my own thing------------------------
Tel: +44 161 436 6131 Fax: +44 161 436 6133 Web: http://www.cs.man.ac.uk/~chl
Email: chl@clw.cs.man.ac.uk Snail: 5 Clerewood Ave, CHEADLE, SK8 3JU, U.K.
PGP: 2C15F1A9 Fingerprint: 73 6D C2 51 93 A0 01 E7 65 E8 64 7E 14 A4 AB A5
*************************************************************
To unsubscribe send a message to majordomo@faqs.org as
unsubscribe faq-maintainers fill-in-your-email-address-here
*************************************************************
[
FAQ Archive |
Search FAQ Mail Archive |
Authors |
Usenet References
]
[
1993 |
1994 |
1995 |
1996 |
1997 |
1998 |
1999 |
2000
]
© Copyright The Internet FAQ Consortium, 1997-2000
All rights reserved