FAQ Maintainers Mailing List
Re: [faq-maintainers] FAQs and Criticism (was Intro...)

---------

From: Matthew Weigel (Matthew_Weigel@deneb.fac.cs.cmu.edu)
Date: Thu Jan 03 2002 - 18:06:40 CST


> > > I'd rather see a broad-minded examination of the term's meaning and
> > > usage, how this accords with specific schools or traditions of
> > > martial arts, how this compares with conventional religious
> > > cosmologies and metaphysics, etc.
>
> Try to keep religion, cosmology and metaphysics asside.

Well, the history *is* interesting...

> Ki is complicated enough to define without bringing in the extra
> luggage.

...but it can get pretty bogged down :-)

> I practice Aikido and can manage the unbendable arm trick.

Which predisposes you to hold a particular opinion on the subject :-)

At the very minimum, what aikidoka taijiquan players refer to as ki and
qi (respectively) has pretty interstingly different uses and theories,
disregarding whether it's 'real.'

> > [...] ki (Japanese), and ki (Korean) [...]
> ^^ ^^
> Is it the character set ? :-)

The character is the same, and (as I recall) it is the same character
as in Chinese (traditional). Ever heard of hapkido
(http://www.cs.cmu.edu/~mcweigel/rmafaq/rmafaq2.html#16.8)?

-- 
 Matthew Weigel
 Research Systems Programmer
 mcweigel+@cs.cmu.edu

************************************************************* To unsubscribe send a message to majordomo@faqs.org as

unsubscribe faq-maintainers fill-in-your-email-address-here *************************************************************



[ FAQ Archive | Search FAQ Mail Archive | Authors | Usenet References ]
[ 1993 | 1994 | 1995 | 1996 | 1997 | 1998 | 1999 | 2000
]

---------

faq-admin@faqs.org

© Copyright The Internet FAQ Consortium, 1997-2000
All rights reserved